# Individual identification of bony fishes using unique body markings: Implications and applications

**Authors:** Katie Dunkley, Samuel R. Matchette, Cheuk Yu Hau, Christian Drerup, Roxanne B. Holmes, Yvonne Sadovy de Mitcheson, James E. Herbert‐Read

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/jfb.70180 · Journal of Fish Biology · 2025-08-20

## TL;DR

This paper reviews how unique body markings can be used to identify individual bony fish, promoting a non-invasive and cost-effective method for research and conservation.

## Contribution

The paper highlights the underutilized potential of photo-identification for bony fishes and proposes strategies to overcome current barriers.

## Key findings

- Photo-identification is a non-invasive and cost-effective tool for tracking bony fish individuals.
- Few studies have applied this method to bony fishes despite their diverse markings.
- Advancements in camera tech and AI can help overcome current limitations in using body markings.

## Abstract

The natural variation in animal body markings, such as spots, stripes and blotches, offers a powerful tool for researchers, conservationists, citizen scientists and resource managers to distinguish specific individuals within species. By building libraries of photo‐identified individuals, we can track and differentiate individuals over time and space, thereby non‐invasively and often cost‐effectively studying species' biology and behaviour. This, in turn, enhances our understanding of species' ecological roles, and informs and supports effective conservation strategies. Although photo‐identification has been successfully applied to various aquatic species, including cetaceans, sharks and rays, it remains surprisingly underutilised for bony fishes. Indeed, despite their striking diversity of colours and patterns, relatively few studies have used natural markings to non‐invasively investigate bony fish biology and conservation. In this review, we highlight the potential of photo‐identification as a valuable research and management tool for these fishes in both field and laboratory environments. We outline the scientific, practical and ethical benefits of this approach, illustrating how individual identification can advance our understanding of fish biology and support their conservation efforts. We also discuss previous applications of photo‐identification in bony fishes, examine barriers to its broader adoption and address common misconceptions that may limit its use. We propose strategies to overcome these challenges driven by advancements in camera technology and artificial intelligence, and discuss scenarios where photo‐identification may prove particularly effective. Through this review, we therefore aim to encourage the broader use of natural body markings as a non‐invasive method in bony fish research, management and conservation.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** AI (MESH:C538142), black spot syndrome (MESH:D008796), aggression (MESH:D010554), PHOTO (MESH:D054039), blackspot trematode infections (MESH:D014201), Injuries (MESH:D014947), deaths (MESH:D003643)
- **Chemicals:** carotenoid (MESH:D002338), pteridine (MESH:D011621), melanin (MESH:D008543), water (MESH:D014867)
- **Species:** Synchiropus splendidus (mandarinfish, species) [taxon 270530], Neotrygon orientalis (species) [taxon 2797475], Gobiodon histrio (broad-barred goby, species) [taxon 151729], Pomacentrus amboinensis (Ambon damsel, species) [taxon 393602], Elasmobranchii (elasmobranchs, subclass) [taxon 7778], Salmo salar (Atlantic salmon, species) [taxon 8030], Oryzias latipes (Japanese medaka, species) [taxon 8090], Delphinus delphis (Black Sea dolphin, species) [taxon 9728], Asteroidea (sea stars, class) [taxon 7588], Danio rerio (leopard danio, species) [taxon 7955], Pomacanthus imperator (emperor angelfish, species) [taxon 109711], Dicentrarchus labrax (European sea bass, species) [taxon 13489], Cantherhines dumerilii (whitespotted filefish, species) [taxon 303712], Cantherhines macrocerus (American whitespotted filefish, species) [taxon 1183373], Poecilia reticulata (guppy, species) [taxon 8081], Upeneichthys lineatus (blue-lined goatfish, species) [taxon 665594], Cyprinus carpio (carp, species) [taxon 7962], Sphyrna mokarran (great hammerhead, species) [taxon 195334], Oreochromis niloticus (Nile tilapia, species) [taxon 8128], Coleoptera (beetles, order) [taxon 7041], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Mola alexandrini (bump-head sunfish, species) [taxon 2169563], Rhincodon typus (whale shark, species) [taxon 259920], Orectolobus maculatus (spotted wobbegong, species) [taxon 168098], Megaptera novaeangliae (humpback whale, species) [taxon 9773], Amphiprion (genus) [taxon 80969], Rosalia alpina (species) [taxon 1400418], Monacanthus tuckeri (slender filefish, species) [taxon 1112860], Aracana ornata (ornate cowfish, species) [taxon 303739], Pisaster giganteus (species) [taxon 189915], Rineloricaria aequalicuspis (species) [taxon 1748007], Cheilinus undulatus (humphead wrasse, species) [taxon 241271], Synchiropus picturatus (picturesque dragonet, species) [taxon 586865]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12861832/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12861832/full.md

## References

146 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12861832/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12861832