# Guy Talk, Precarious Masculinity, and Men’s Sexual Health: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Men’s Health Magazine Covers

## TL;DR

This study explores how Men’s Health magazine covers use 'guy talk' to address men’s sexual health, reflecting fragile masculinity and societal neglect of men’s health needs.

## Contribution

The paper introduces 'guy talk' as a marketing strategy tied to precarious masculinity, revealing how it affects men’s health discourse.

## Key findings

- Only 8% of magazine covers addressed men’s sexual health, highlighting a significant gap in visibility.
- Themes like sexual health concerns and testosterone were framed through 'guy talk' to avoid vulnerability.
- The use of slang and irony in coverlines reflects and reinforces precarious masculinity.

## Abstract

The current study engages precarious masculinity as a framework to examine sexual health in magazines marketed for male audiences. Precarious masculinity is the idea that masculinity is fragile and always being challenged or questioned, particularly considering pressures to defend the social status and privilege associated with masculinity. We conducted a qualitative content analysis of the text or “coverlines” on the covers of Men’s Health magazines over nearly 40 years (1986–2024; N = 333) of which only 26 (8%) covers address men’s sexual health. Such few coverlines on these topics suggests men’s “visible invisibility,” a concept that describes men’s dominant place in society and the prioritization of their sex lives with women, yet also significant gaps in knowledge, access, and care for men’s sexual health. Our findings reveal three key themes wherein appeals to precarious masculinity are evident: sexual health concerns (e.g., condoms, vasectomies, and prostates), “the truth about testosterone,” and sexual functioning and aesthetics. We identify the verbiage used on the covers of men’s magazines as “guy talk” that involves silly, ironic, or slang-laden verbiage. Using guy talk as a marketing tactic both exposes the precarity of masculinity and serves as a compensatory manhood act that allows men to avoid perceived social consequences associated with expressions of vulnerability and thus preserve masculine privilege. We conclude that the guy talk in men’s magazines that caters to precarious masculinity and, with men’s visible invisibility, does a disservice to men’s health and well-being.