# U.S. states opting out of expanded methadone take-home policies and associated mortality

**Authors:** Victor Roy, Michele J. Buonora, Cristina Murray-Krezan, Anthony Fabio, Paul J. Joudrey

PMC · DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2025.209800 · Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2026-02-01

## TL;DR

This study examines how U.S. states that opted out of expanded methadone take-home policies compared to those that continued them in terms of overdose deaths.

## Contribution

The study provides population-level evidence on the safety of expanded methadone take-home policies.

## Key findings

- No significant association was found between opting out of expanded take-home dosing and methadone-related overdose death rates.
- Adjustments for non-methadone-related overdose variables yielded similar results.
- Continued expanded take-home methadone dosing did not lead to increased methadone-related overdose deaths.

## Abstract

Historically, federal regulations limited take-home methadone doses largely due to concerns about methadone-related overdose. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, an emergency federal policy in March 2020 permitted states to expand take-home methadone doses. Our objective was to utilize state-level variation in take-home expansion to compare changes in methadone related overdose death rates among states that opted into and then out of expanded take-home dosing with states that opted into and continued the policy.

We used an extended two-way fixed effects difference-in-differences (DID) approach. The intervention group included states that initially opted into and then out of expanded take-home dosing, while the comparison group included states that opted into and continued the policy. Our primary outcome was the average treatment effect on the treated states (ATET) using quarterly rate of methadone-related overdose deaths per 100,000 persons from April 2020 to December 2022. Data sources included a state policy review, CDC WONDER, and U.S. Census Bureau.

The intervention group included three states that opted out of expanded take-home dosing, while the comparison group comprised 16 states maintaining the policy. We found no significant association between opting out of expanded take-home dosing and methadone-related overdose death rates [ATET = 0.02, 95 % CI = (−0.03, 0.47), p = 0.47]. Adjustments for non-methadone-related overdose variables yielded similar results.

States who continued expanded take-home methadone dosing did not subsequently experience a detectable increase in methadone-related overdose deaths relative to states that opted out of the policy. This evidence suggests that policies expanding methadone take-homes are safe at a population level, which can inform deliberations within states that currently maintain strict restrictions.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** overdose (MESH:D062787), COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382)
- **Chemicals:** methadone (MESH:D008691)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12861035/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12861035/full.md

## References

18 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12861035/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12861035