Correction: Cost-effectiveness analysis of sedation regimens for children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging in Japan: a simulation-based study
Soichiro Obara, Yoshinori Nakata

Abstract
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnesthesia and Sedative Agents · Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders · Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Correction: Journal of Anesthesia 10.1007/s00540-025-03540-8
The article “Cost-effectiveness analysis of sedation regimens for children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging in Japan: a simulation-based study”, written by Soichiro Obara, Yoshinori Nakata, was originally published under exclusive license to The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. As a result of the subsequent decision to publish the article under the open access model, the article’s copyright notice was changed on 31 October 2025 to © The Author(s) 2025 and the article is now distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
The original article has been corrected.
