Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols: Impact on patient outcomes
Pranavkumar Amrutlal Parthsarthi, Ankit Ashok Agrawal, Alpeshkumar Parmar, Manchireddy Manish, Indraj Arora, Manisha Kumari
TL;DR
This study shows that Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols improve recovery and reduce complications after abdominal surgery.
Contribution
The study provides empirical evidence of ERAS benefits in elective abdominal surgeries through a comparative analysis.
Findings
ERAS patients had significantly lower pain scores and faster recovery milestones.
The ERAS group experienced fewer complications and shorter hospital stays.
No increased readmission rates were observed in the ERAS group.
Abstract
An ERAS protocols in improving postoperative outcomes after elective abdominal surgeries is of interest. Hence, a total of 138 patients were analyzed with 68 receiving ERAS-based care and 70 receiving conventional management. The ERAS group had significantly lower pain scores, reached their recovery milestones sooner and had fewer complications. The average length stay was significantly shorter and there were no increased readmission rates. Thus, we show continued dissemination and implementation of ERAS protocols for improved surgical recovery.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEnhanced Recovery After Surgery · Nausea and vomiting management · Nutrition and Health in Aging