Thickness effect on optical behavior of monolithic zirconia
Manisha Yersong, Akshay Bhargava, Rajiv Kumar Gupta, Bharti Dua1, P. Lakshmi Priyadarsini, Rushikesh Kaknale

TL;DR
This study shows how the thickness of zirconia affects its color and translucency, with 1.0 mm being the most esthetically suitable for dental restorations.
Contribution
The study introduces a comparative analysis of optical properties between monolithic and veneered zirconia at different thicknesses.
Findings
Veneered zirconia showed the highest lightness, while 0.5 mm monolithic zirconia was the darkest.
A 1.0 mm thickness of monolithic zirconia matched veneered zirconia with acceptable color differences.
Increasing thickness reduced translucency, with 1.0 mm being the most esthetically favorable.
Abstract
Achieving optimal esthetics in all-ceramic restorations remains a challenge due to variations in translucency and color influenced by material thickness. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of thickness on the optical properties of monolithic zirconia compared to veneered zirconia. Fifty zirconia discs were fabricated in varying thicknesses (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mm) and analyzed for color and translucency using a spectrophotometer. Veneered zirconia exhibited the highest lightness, while 0.5 mm monolithic zirconia appeared darkest with clinically unacceptable ΔE values. The 1.0 mm monolithic zirconia showed the closest match to veneered zirconia with acceptable color differences. Overall, increasing thickness reduced translucency, and a 1.0 mm thickness offered the most esthetically favorable balance for clinical applications.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDental materials and restorations · Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques · Anatomy and Medical Technology
