Putting People in Boxes: Iranian Exiles and Queer Identities
Moira Dustin

TL;DR
This paper explores how shifting views on gender and sexuality in Iran challenge legal frameworks for asylum seekers.
Contribution
It highlights the tension between legal categories and the fluidity of queer identities in Iranian exile communities.
Findings
Queer Iranians in exile experience contradictions between legal asylum criteria and their lived identities.
Iranian scholarship complicates Western narratives about stable sexual and gender identities.
Current asylum laws rely on outdated, fixed understandings of gender and sexuality.
Abstract
Sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and sex characteristics (SOGIESC) are no longer uniformly viewed as stable and permanent individual attributes in academic and public discourse. Iran, and Iranian scholarship, has been an important site for this destabilisation. Postcolonial, feminist and queer theorists have mapped changes since the nineteenth century in how Iranian individuals and society perceive sexual and gender identities and behaviours, often attributing shifts in discourse to Iran’s engagement with Europe. Without overlooking the marginalisation and abuse of queer Iranians, this scholarship undermines simplistic Western narratives to create a more nuanced analysis of their experiences and related discourses. Meanwhile, and in contrast, in the broader field of refugee law and scholarship, homophobia and transphobia are now recognised as grounds for claiming…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsJewish and Middle Eastern Studies · Turkey's Politics and Society
