# Hierarchy and hope: Exploring AI’s role in medicine through a thematic analysis of online discourse

**Authors:** Johan Pushani, Sherwin Rajkumar, Alishya Burrell, Erin Peebles, Amrit Kirpalani

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0001212 · PLOS Digital Health · 2026-01-30

## TL;DR

This study explores how healthcare professionals and students view AI in medicine, finding that opinions are shaped by perceived job hierarchy and whether AI is seen as a tool or a threat.

## Contribution

The study reveals a socially hierarchical bias in how AI is perceived to replace roles in medicine, highlighting implications for collaboration and patient care.

## Key findings

- AI is seen as a tool to enhance efficiency in tasks like studying, note writing, and triage, but requires human oversight.
- A hierarchy of job risk exists, with lower-status roles viewed as more vulnerable to AI replacement than specialists.
- Perceptions of AI are influenced by professional identity and hierarchy, which may affect collaboration and implementation.

## Abstract

The healthcare community remains divided on the benefits of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine. In this qualitative study, we sought to better understand the perceived opportunities and threats of AI among premedical students, medical students, and physicians. We conducted a thematic analysis on Reddit, a social platform where candid opinions are often shared. Posts from the r/premed, r/medicalschool, and r/medicine subreddits were searched using the terms “AI”, “chatGPT”, “openAI”, and “artificial intelligence”. We analyzed 2403 comments across 47 threads from December 2022 to August 2023. A coding scheme was developed manually following Braun and Clarke’s (2006) framework, and common themes were extracted. The main themes identified centered on AI enhancement versus replacement. Careers perceived to be lower in the medical social hierarchy were considered most at risk of replacement. AI was thought to first replace non-medical jobs, followed by mid-levels, and then primary care and diagnostic specialties, with specialists and surgeons affected last. Some contributors emphasized that AI could never replace a physician’s compassion and nuanced clinical judgment. Others viewed AI as a tool to enhance efficiency, particularly in tasks such as studying, note writing, screening, and triage. Although verifying the credentials of commenters on online forums poses a challenge, platforms like Reddit offer a valuable opportunity to understand nuanced attitudes and perceptions regarding AI in medicine. Online forums allow for a unique understanding of the impressions of AI in medicine. While AI was generally well-received, we identified a key finding: a socially hierarchical, biased form of thinking among healthcare professionals. The perpetuation of this biased mindset may contribute to role devaluation, mistrust, and collaboration challenges within healthcare teams–ultimately impacting patient care. To fully leverage AI’s potential in medicine, it is critical to acknowledge and address potentially biased perceptions within the healthcare community.

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools, like ChatGPT, are rapidly becoming part of healthcare, yet there is still uncertainty about whether AI will primarily support clinicians or replace them. In this study, we analyzed public online discussions to better understand how these groups talk about AI in medicine. Using thematic analysis, we reviewed 2,403 comments across 47 Reddit threads from December 2022 to August 2023. We found two dominant themes. First, many users viewed AI as an enhancement tool, supporting studying, writing, clinical documentation, and early screening or triage - while emphasizing that AI can be inaccurate and requires human oversight. Second, others emphasized AI as a potential replacement force, often predicting a “hierarchy” of job risk where roles perceived as lower in the medical social structure were viewed as more vulnerable to automation than specialist physicians. These findings suggest that opinions about AI are shaped not only by technology, but also by professional identity and hierarchy, factors that may influence collaboration and the equitable implementation of AI in healthcare.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** writer's block (MESH:D020821), AI (MESH:C538142), bleeds (MESH:D006470), vessel occlusions (MESH:C536223)
- **Chemicals:** oxygen (MESH:D010100)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12858004/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12858004/full.md

## References

21 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12858004/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12858004