# The orchestrated interplay between DNA methylation and N6-methyladenosine modification: status quo and future perspectives

## TL;DR

This review explores how DNA methylation and m6A RNA modification interact, offering a framework to understand their complex relationship and guide future research.

## Contribution

The paper introduces a novel classification system for DNA methylation and m6A interactions, highlighting new research directions.

## Key findings

- DNA methylation and m6A interact through six distinct modes, including direct and indirect regulatory mechanisms.
- The review identifies gaps in current research and proposes new hypotheses for future studies.
- A systematic analysis of 29 studies reveals cooperative and co-expression patterns between the two modifications.

## Abstract

DNA methylation (DNAme) and N6-methyladenosine (m6A) represent key mechanisms in epigenetic and epitranscriptomic regulation, respectively. While DNAme is a well-established modification, m6A has more recently emerged as a central focus of epitranscriptomic research. This review comprehensively explores the dynamic crosstalk between DNAme and m6A, addressing the molecular intricacies and functional consequences of their interplay. A systematic literature search conducted in Web of Science Core Collection identified 972 publications related to both modifications. After rigorous screening, 29 studies directly investigating interactions between DNAme and m6A were included for in-depth analysis. These interactions were systematically classified into six distinct modes: (1) DNAme-mediated regulation of m6A; (2) m6A-dependent modulation of DNAme; (3) indirect interplay mediated by intermediate factors; (4) direct bilateral regulation between DNAme and m6A; (5) cooperative targeting of common downstream genes or biological processes; and (6) co-expression patterns suggestive of functional interplay. This categorization provides a novel conceptual framework that integrates disparate mechanistic insights, highlights under-explored areas, and proposes new hypotheses for future research. By synthesizing and structuring current knowledge, this review serves as a foundational resource for understanding the complex relationship between these two modifications and facilitates the identification of novel regulatory axes in epigenomic and epitranscriptomic research.