# Hospital Discharge Planning—An Investigation of Outcomes and Interventions

**Authors:** Lena Imhof, Robin Heber, Kai Svane Blume, Jonas Schreyoegg, Vera Winter

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.70060 · Health Services Research · 2025-10-23

## TL;DR

This study reviews hospital discharge planning interventions and finds that high-intensity programs reduce readmissions and improve patient satisfaction.

## Contribution

A comprehensive umbrella review of discharge planning interventions and outcomes with an evaluation of evidence strength.

## Key findings

- High-intensity bundled discharge programs reduce readmissions and medication discrepancies.
- Evidence for improved quality of life and mortality remains weak.
- Tailored strategies are recommended based on patient populations and intervention types.

## Abstract

To provide a comprehensive overview of the different types of hospital discharge planning (DP) interventions and outcomes examined in systematic reviews, and to assess the strength of evidence (SoE) for the associations between DP and these outcomes.

Umbrella review (“review of systematic reviews”).

We searched five databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Business Source Complete) from inception through February 2024 for systematic reviews examining associations between hospital DP and various outcomes. We conducted backward and forward citation searches to identify additional systematic reviews. Altogether, these searches yielded 1817 records, of which 34 met the inclusion criteria. We assessed the methodological quality of the included reviews using the AMSTAR 2 tool, summarized DP intervention types and the reviews' subgroup analyses narratively, and evaluated the SoE for 19 outcomes using a recently developed method.

We identified 20 distinct DP intervention types which we grouped into six intervention categories. Patient education was the most frequently investigated type. We rated SoE as high for five outcomes, moderate for eight, and low for six. We found the strongest evidence for associations between hospital DP and reduced readmissions, fewer medication discrepancies, and greater patient satisfaction. Evidence for associations with quality of life, emergency department visits, mortality, and overall patient health, however, was weak or lacking. Our synthesis of the reviews' subgroup analyses indicated that the effects of hospital DP varied across patient populations and intervention types. Overall, the most effective interventions appeared to be high‐intensity, bundled programs, incorporating medication‐related interventions and follow‐ups, particularly for reducing readmissions.

This umbrella review synthesizes evidence on associations between hospital DP and various outcomes. The findings support the development of tailored DP strategies and point to research gaps. Future studies should prioritize standardizing intervention definitions, outcome measures, and subgroup classifications, and investigate unexamined causal mechanisms.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12857470/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12857470/full.md

## References

70 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12857470/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12857470