# The aetiology of breast cancer subtypes: results from the Million Women Study

**Authors:** Gillian Reeves, Kirstin Pirie, Sarah Floud, Judith Black, Krystyna Baker, Toral Gathani

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s13058-025-02197-1 · Breast Cancer Research : BCR · 2025-12-28

## TL;DR

This study explores how risk factors for breast cancer differ across subtypes, finding that most are linked to hormone-sensitive cancers, while some are more specific to aggressive subtypes like basal-like cancer.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into how risk factors vary by breast cancer subtype, particularly highlighting differences for ER- and basal-like cancers.

## Key findings

- Most risk factors are primarily associated with ER+ breast cancer, including age at first birth, BMI, and hormone therapy use.
- Prior oral contraceptive use is more strongly linked to ER- breast cancer compared to ER+ cancer.
- Parity and breastfeeding show specific associations with basal-like breast cancer.

## Abstract

Evidence regarding the aetiology of specific breast cancer subtypes may provide insights into the mechanisms underlying their development, and improve prevention of rarer but more aggressive subtypes. We investigated risk factor associations with surrogate molecular subtypes of breast cancer in a large cohort of UK women.

In 1.2 million postmenopausal women aged 50–64 recruited into the Million Women Study in 1996–2001, we estimated risks of breast cancer subtypes (defined by oestrogen receptor [ER], progesterone receptor [PR], and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2] status) in relation to established risk factors for breast cancer.

Among 1,228,671 eligible women, followed on average for 19.8 (SD 6.5) years, there were 58,134 incident breast cancers with known ER status and 40,627 with known surrogate molecular subtype (based on ER, PR, and HER2 status). Most established risk factors were primarily either positively (age at first birth, age at menopause, BMI, height, alcohol intake, and menopausal hormone therapy use) or inversely (parity) associated with ER+ cancer (p-value for heterogeneity by ER status < = 0.002 in each case). Only prior oral contraceptive (OC) use showed a greater association with ER than with ER+ cancer (p = 0.002). Some additional differences were observed by surrogate molecular subtype including a modest positive association of parity, and inverse association of breastfeeding, with the risk of basal-like cancer.

Most established risk factors for breast cancer are almost exclusively associated with hormone-sensitive cancers but some have definite associations with ER- cancers (prior OC use), or more specifically, with basal-like cancer (parity, breastfeeding).

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13058-025-02197-1.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** breast cancer (MONDO:0004989)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** EREG (epiregulin) [NCBI Gene 2069] {aka EPR, ER, Ep}, PGR (progesterone receptor) [NCBI Gene 5241] {aka NR3C3, PR}, ERBB2 (erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2) [NCBI Gene 2064] {aka CD340, HER-2, HER-2/neu, HER2, MLN 19, MLN-19}
- **Diseases:** breast cancer (MESH:D001943), basal-like cancer (MESH:D009369)
- **Chemicals:** alcohol (MESH:D000438)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12857095/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12857095/full.md

## References

4 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12857095/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12857095