# Implications of global distributive justice principles for implementation of the Kunming‐Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework

## TL;DR

This paper explores how global justice principles can guide fair implementation of biodiversity targets, emphasizing the role of high-income countries.

## Contribution

A novel distributive justice framework is proposed for the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.

## Key findings

- High-income countries should provide significant financial resources for biodiversity action.
- These countries have a moral obligation to reduce biodiversity pressures through consumption and pollution changes.
- Institutional innovations in the GBF can support its just implementation.

## Abstract

In the era of the sixth mass extinction, reversing global biodiversity loss is of vital importance for life on Earth. In 2022, parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) adopted the Kunming‐Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF), a strategic plan with 23 action‐oriented targets to be achieved by 2030. However, biodiversity action carries direct and indirect costs that are unevenly distributed globally. Moreover, parties to the CBD may differ relative to various aspects of bearing these costs. Although the GBF implicitly acknowledges its parties’ common but different responsibilities for its implementation, what this means in practice is left open. We suggested a distributive justice framework to guide global sharing of the costs of biodiversity action, with a focus on specific GBF targets. We combined the contributor pays, beneficiary pays, and ability to pay principles from the normative‐philosophical justice literature together with empirical information on trends in biodiversity degradation, benefits from resource exploitation, and livelihood levels in different countries to develop a distinct and comprehensive account of distributive justice in a global biodiversity policy context and to specify implications for target implementation. Our framework suggests that high‐income countries should provide substantial financial resources for the implementation of GBF targets domestically and internationally. Moreover, these countries have a particularly high moral obligation to take action to reduce pressure on biodiversity—for instance, by reducing pollution or changing consumption patterns. Recent institutional innovations related to the funding, planning, monitoring, reporting, and review structures of the GBF hold promise for its just implementation, which ultimately depends on parties’ political will.