# Artificial intelligence and precision medicine: a pilot study predicting optimal ceftaroline dosage for pediatric patients

**Authors:** Maria Frasca, Gianluca Gazzaniga, Agnese Graziosi, Valentina De Nicolo, Costantino De Giacomo, Stefano Martinelli, Michele Senatore, Alessandra Romandini, Chiara Moretti, Giulia Angela Carla Pattarino, Alice Proto, Romano Danesi, Francesco Scaglione, Gianluca Vago, Davide La Torre, Arianna Pani

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/frai.2025.1702087 · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · 2026-01-16

## TL;DR

This study uses machine learning to predict optimal ceftaroline doses for children, improving accuracy over traditional methods and helping achieve therapeutic drug levels.

## Contribution

The novel use of interpretable machine learning models to optimize ceftaroline dosing in pediatrics, surpassing standard weight-based approaches.

## Key findings

- MLP and XGBoost models achieved high accuracy in predicting ceftaroline doses with R2 scores of 0.94 and 0.89 respectively.
- Model-based simulated concentrations reached therapeutic levels in 85% of cases, with top models achieving over 90% patient-level alignment.
- Renal function markers and anthropometric parameters were identified as the most influential predictors for optimal dosing.

## Abstract

Accurate drug dosing in pediatrics is complicated by age-related physiological variability. Standard weight-based dosing may result in either subtherapeutic exposure or toxicity. Machine learning (ML) models can capture complex relationships among clinical variables and support individualized therapy.

We analyzed clinical and pharmacokinetic data from 20 pediatric patients enrolled in the PUERI study (January 2020–November 2021, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy). Eight ML models-including linear regression (LR), ridge regression (RR), lasso regression (LaR), Huber regression (HR), random forest (RF), XGBoost, LightGBM, and a neural network (MLP)-were trained to predict ceftaroline doses that would achieve plasma concentrations close to the therapeutic target of 10 mg/L. Model performance was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and the coefficient of determination (R2). To ensure interpretability, we applied local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) to identify the most influential predictors of dose.

MLP (MAE 1.53 mg, R2 0.94) and XGBoost (MAE 2.04 mg, R2 0.89) outperformed linear models. Predicted doses were more frequently aligned with therapeutic concentrations than those clinically administered. Model-based simulated concentrations fell within the therapeutic range in approximately 85% of cases, and the best ML models showed over 90% patient-level clinical. RF, LightGBM and XGBoost achieved the highest clinical alignment, with 94.2, 92.4 and 91.5% of patients reaching therapeutic levels. Renal function markers, such as serum creatinine and azotemia, together with anthropometric parameters including weight, height, and body mass index, were consistently the most influential features.

Advanced ML models can optimize ceftaroline dosing in pediatric patients and outperform traditional dosing strategies. Combining predictive accuracy with interpretability (via LIME) supports clinical trust and may enhance precision antibiotic therapy while reducing the risks of antimicrobial resistance and toxicity.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** ceftaroline (PubChem CID 9852981)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** toxicity (MESH:D064420), azotemia (MESH:D053099)
- **Chemicals:** ceftaroline (MESH:C490727), creatinine (MESH:D003404)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12856755/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12856755/full.md

## References

13 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12856755/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12856755