Preferences for an Experience Sampling Method–Based Tool as an Adjunct to Usual Treatment in Patients With Problem Substance Use: Qualitative Study
Adam Kurilla, Natália Čavojská, Theresa Ikegwuonu, Marta Nemčíková, Julia CC Schulte-Strathaus, Lotte Uyttebroek, Joanne R Beames, Dagmar Breznoščáková, Daniel Dančík, Michal Hajdúk, Anton Heretik, Ľubomíra Izáková, Zuzana Katreniaková, Inez Myin-Germeys, Ján Pečeňák

TL;DR
This study explores what features people with substance use disorders prefer in a mobile mental health tool that uses real-time data collection.
Contribution
The study identifies specific user preferences for ESM-based tools among substance users, emphasizing customization and communication features.
Findings
Participants preferred short questionnaires with open-text responses and Ecological Momentary Interventions.
Data visualization was seen as important for communication with clinicians.
Preferences included customization options and controlled data sharing based on relationship quality.
Abstract
Mobile health tools that use the Experience Sampling Method (ESM) appear to be a promising tool to streamline and improve the treatment of substance use disorders. However, patient involvement in the development of these tools is uncommon, and research on the preferences of people being treated for substance use disorders has been scarce. In the scope of the European Union IMMERSE (Implementing Mobile Mental health Recording Strategy for Europe) consortium, an ESM-based tool for Digital Mobile Mental Health (DMMH) was first codeveloped and later tested in 4 European countries. This study aimed to achieve an understanding of preferences for features of DMMH among mental health service users with problem substance use. In 4 European countries, service users were recruited for a semistructured qualitative interview, which started with the presentation of a prototype of the DMMH. Data…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMental Health Research Topics · Digital Mental Health Interventions · Flow Experience in Various Fields
