Device-Removal, Reinfection, and Mortality After Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
Kasper Høtoft Bengtsen, Melanie Vuong Le, Ketil Haugan, Berit Thornvig Philbert, Jens Brock Johansen, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Sam Riahi, Jens Cosedis Nielsen, Charlotte Larroudé, Amna Alhakak, Henning Bundgaard, Andreas Petersen, Anders Rhod Larsen, Lauge Østergaard

TL;DR
This study examines outcomes of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in patients with cardiac devices, finding that device removal is linked to lower reinfection and mortality.
Contribution
The study provides real-world evidence on the impact of device removal in CIED patients with SAB in a nationwide cohort.
Findings
CIED patients with SAB had slightly higher 30-day mortality than controls.
Device removal within 30 days was associated with lower reinfection and mortality rates.
Only 15.8% of CIED patients underwent device removal after SAB diagnosis.
Abstract
In case of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB), complete cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) removal is advised by the European Heart Rhythm Association. The objective of the study was to estimate clinical outcomes after SAB in the Danish CIED carriers. We conducted a nationwide register-based cohort study including all patients with SAB after CIED implantation between 2000 and 2020. Cumulative incidence of device removal, SAB reinfection, and all-cause mortality were estimated and compared to sex and age-matched non-CIED controls with SAB. Landmark analysis at the time of hospital discharge estimating mortality and reinfection according to CIED removal status in surviving patients was conducted. In total, 1,816 patients with CIED and SAB and 9,080 matched controls were included in the study (median age 77.5 years, 73.0% males). Thirty-day all-cause mortality was 34.0%…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies · Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices · Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
