Participation behaviour of different migrant groups in breast cancer screening – palpation of the breast and mammography. Results from the German national cohort (NAKO)
Heiko Becher, Nadia Obi, Tilman Brand, Hermann Brenner, Laura Buschmann, Renée T. Fortner, Karin Halina Greiser, Volker Harth, Wolfgang Hoffmann, André Karch, Thomas Keil, Alexander Kluttig, Lilian Krist, Michael Leitzmann, Andy Maun, Rafael Mikolajczyk, Katharina Nimptsch

TL;DR
The study finds that migrant women in Germany participate less in breast palpation screening compared to native Germans, but mammography participation is similar across groups.
Contribution
This study provides new insights into how migration status and language proficiency affect participation in two breast cancer screening methods in Germany.
Findings
Migrant women, especially Turkish, have lower odds of undergoing breast palpation compared to native Germans.
Mammography participation is similar across migrant and non-migrant groups.
Language proficiency affects breast palpation more than mammography participation.
Abstract
•breast cancer screening programs in Germany covered by health insurance include palpation of the breast by a physician (from age 30) and mammography (age 50 to 75).•Palpation of the breast was less frequently utilized in all migrant groups with odds ratios ranging from 0.5 (95 % CI 0.4–0.6) for Turkish women to 0.9 for women from western countries (95 % CI 0.7–1.1) compared to autochthone Germans.•Lower German language proficiency further decreases its use.•Mammography participation did not differ substantially compared to Germans with odds ratios ranging from 0.8 to 1.2.•German language proficiency had little effect on mammography participation. breast cancer screening programs in Germany covered by health insurance include palpation of the breast by a physician (from age 30) and mammography (age 50 to 75). Palpation of the breast was less frequently utilized in all migrant groups…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening · Global Health Workforce Issues · Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
