Prognostic value of FDG-PET SUV changes in cervical cancer following radiation therapy: a retrospective cohort study
Claudia A. Bale, Janina V. Pearce, Xiaoyan Deng, Dipankar Bandyopadhyay, Nophar Yarden, Catherine Sport, Devin T. Miller, Leslie M. Randall, Emma Fields, Stephanie A. Sullivan

TL;DR
This study found that changes in FDG-PET SUV values after radiation therapy for cervical cancer do not reliably predict cancer recurrence or survival.
Contribution
The study provides new evidence that post-treatment SUV changes are not predictive of outcomes in cervical cancer patients.
Findings
SUV changes in the cervix and lymph nodes were not significantly different between patients with and without recurrence.
Percent decrease in SUV was not predictive of local or overall recurrence.
Changes in SUV were not associated with overall or progression-free survival.
Abstract
This study sought to determine the relationship between cervical cancer recurrence and post-treatment change in standardized uptake value (SUV) of 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the cervix and lymph nodes. This retrospective cohort study included patients who received curative intent radiation therapy for biopsy-proven stage I–IVA locally advanced cervical cancer at a single tertiary referral center from 2009 to 2021. The exposure was percent change in SUV from pre- to post-treatment FDG-PET scans at the cervix and lymph nodes. The primary outcome was recurrence rate, and secondary outcomes were overall and progression-free survival. Firth’s penalized logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess associations. 55 patients met eligibility criteria. Recurrence rate was 27% (15/55); of these, 33% had local recurrence…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments · Cervical Cancer and HPV Research · Head and Neck Cancer Studies
