Universal credit trajectories among individuals who access secondary mental health services: analysis of linked data
Sharon A. M. Stevelink, Sarah Ledden, Ioannis Bakolis, Ray Leal, Ira Madan, Matthew Hotopf, Nicola T. Fear, Thomas Lorentzen

TL;DR
This study explores how people using mental health services in the UK experience Universal Credit, identifying different patterns of benefit receipt and work requirements over time.
Contribution
The study introduces a novel analysis of Universal Credit trajectories among mental health service users, linking health and benefits data to explore patterns and sociodemographic associations.
Findings
Six distinct Universal Credit trajectories were identified, including clusters for short-term, medium-term, and long-term work searches.
Women were more likely to be in the medium-term work search cluster, while older individuals were more likely in the long-term work search and no work requirements clusters.
Those with severe mental illness were overrepresented in the no work requirements cluster.
Abstract
To examine Universal Credit (UC) trajectories, and transitions between UC conditionality regimes among secondary care mental health service users. Sociodemographic and diagnostic characteristics associated with UC trajectories were explored. Mental health record data from 4876 individuals who attended mental health services were linked with administrative benefits data. An entry cohort was created including mental health service users who had received UC in 2016 and followed up for 4.5 years. Sequence analysis was used, followed by cluster analysis to identify typical UC trajectories. Sociodemographic and diagnostic characteristics associated with UC clusters were explored using multinominal logistic regression; results were presented as average marginal effects. Six distinct UC clusters were identified. These clusters indicated: short-term UC searching for work (18.7%), medium-term…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEmployment and Welfare Studies · Mental Health Treatment and Access · Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
