# Cooperative management practices how to influence the productive performance outcomes: Based on the analysis of China’s guangxi 94 farmers professional cooperatives

**Authors:** Ying-dong Zhao, Xin-chao Pan, Zi-lun Zhi, Chuan-yong Tang, Jie Dang, Kun-lin Bai

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0338545 · 2026-01-29

## TL;DR

This study examines how management practices in Chinese farmer cooperatives affect their performance, identifying key factors like planning and investment that lead to better outcomes.

## Contribution

The study introduces a typology of management practices and links them to distinct performance outcomes in farmer cooperatives.

## Key findings

- Management practices determine performance outcomes in farmer cooperatives.
- Planning practices significantly influence profitability, while investment practices impact employment generation.
- External collaboration practices affect technology dissemination and community reputation.

## Abstract

Research on the key factors that influence the productive outcomes of farmer professional cooperatives (FPCs) is essential to develop targeted management approaches that promote sustainable growth. This study investigates how cooperative management practices influence productive performance outcomes through an analysis of 94 FPCs in Guangxi, China.

Employing cluster analysis, Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression, and mediation effect tests, the research categorizes management practices into five typologies (Comprehensive High-Efficiency, Collaboration-Deficient, Monitoring-Deficient, Planning-Deficient, Holistically Deficient) and links these to five distinct performance outcomes (Profitable Outreach High-Efficiency, Loss-Making Insular Low-Efficiency, etc.).

Results reveal that management practices critically determine performance outcomes types. Regression analysis highlights planning practices significantly influenced profitability, while investment practices positively impacted employment generation. Internal governance practices were strongly associated with institutional compliance, and external collaboration practices had a significant effect on technology dissemination and community reputation.Monitoring practices, while not directly impacting performance outcomes, were found to enhance them through management practices and mechanisms. Key behavioral indicators—revenue planning, capital investment, staff capacity, and role optimization—emerge as primary levers for performance optimization.

This study underscore the critical role of management practices in shaping the performance of FPCs, suggestions include emphasizing efficient planning, investing in personnel training, and establishing dynamic adjustment mechanisms to ensure sustainable development. These findings provide empirical insights for optimizing rural collective governance and informing evidence-based policy interventions in developing agricultural economies.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Collaboration-deficient (MESH:D007153), financial deficits (MESH:D009461), FPCs (MESH:C564156)
- **Chemicals:** Intercept (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

20 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12854467/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12854467