Patients' experiences of obstetric and gynaecological care in Québec: interactions with healthcare providers, respect of rights, satisfaction, and trust in the healthcare system
Sylvie Lévesque, Arianne Jean Thorn, Alexandra Toupin, Anna Medvetskaya, Isabelle Boucoiran, Natacha Godbout, Sarah Landry, Marie-Ève Blanchard

TL;DR
This study explores how patients in Québec experience obstetric and gynaecological care, focusing on interactions with healthcare providers, respect for rights, satisfaction, and trust in the system.
Contribution
The study provides new insights into patient experiences and system trust in Québec's obstetric and gynaecological care.
Findings
Positive patient–healthcare provider interactions were reported, but shared decision-making and rights respect were lacking.
Despite relatively high satisfaction, patients showed considerable distrust in the healthcare system.
Meeting patient needs through shared decision-making and rights respect was linked to higher satisfaction and trust.
Abstract
Obstetric and gynaecological care profoundly affects individuals’ health and well-being. However, many international studies reveal negative and even dehumanizing experiences of this type of healthcare. This study documents recent experiences of obstetric and gynaecological care in Québec. We examine patient–healthcare provider interactions, respect for patient rights, whether patient needs are met, and how these factors impact satisfaction with the treatment provided and trust in the healthcare system. The PAROLES project is based on a self-report questionnaire posted online from July 2023 to January 2024. The sample comprises 1490 respondents who reported 1599 recent experiences of obstetric and gynaecological care. Descriptive analyses and linear regressions were performed. Generally, patient–healthcare provider interactions were perceived positively, but some significant…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare · Ethics in medical practice
