# A Critical Health Literacy Podcast to Counter Health Misinformation at Scale: Randomized Controlled Trial

## TL;DR

A health literacy podcast improved parents' critical thinking about health claims and behaviors in a randomized trial.

## Contribution

A scalable, story-based podcast was developed and tested to enhance critical health literacy and counter misinformation.

## Key findings

- Parents who listened to the podcast showed improved critical thinking about health information compared to a control group.
- The podcast led to stronger critical thinking-aligned intended health behaviors and more evidence-informed treatment preferences.
- Podcasts are a low-cost, scalable strategy for promoting health literacy and reducing misinformation.

## Abstract

Widespread misinformation and low critical health literacy pose major barriers to public health worldwide. Rapid, scalable, and evidence-informed digital interventions are urgently needed to strengthen the public’s ability to make informed health decisions.

Informed by critical health literacy frameworks, we developed and tested a brief, story-based critical thinking podcast, Parents Making Informed Health Choices, that was designed to improve critical health literacy and decision-making among US parents.

We conducted a 2-phase study. First, 5 parents participated in the user testing of the prototype podcast and provided qualitative feedback to refine content and delivery. The final podcast delivered 9 evidence-based practice principles through relatable scenarios about mental and physical health. In the second phase, we conducted a 2-arm randomized controlled trial (N=250) with a national online sample of US parents. Participants were randomly assigned to listen to either the critical thinking podcast (n=128, 51.2%) or a control podcast (n=122, 48.8%). There were no significant preintervention group differences except for age, which was controlled for in all analyses. Primary outcomes included critical thinking about health claims, intended health behaviors, attitudes toward evidence-based mental health practices, and treatment preferences.

On average, parents were aged 35 (SD 7.8) years; 49% (121/247) were female, 75% (185/248) were White; and 60.0% (148/248) had a bachelor’s degree or higher. Parents who listened to the critical thinking podcast demonstrated significantly improved critical thinking about health information compared to the control group (B=2.56; P<.001; ∆R2=0.06). They also reported stronger critical thinking–aligned intended behaviors (B=0.252; P=.001; ∆R2=0.015), and more evidence-informed treatment preferences (B=4.89; P=.038; ∆R2=0.02). The effect sizes were small to moderate across outcomes.

Findings suggest that a brief, story-based digital podcast can meaningfully improve critical thinking about health information, intended behaviors, and evidence-based practice attitudes. Podcasts represent a promising, low-cost, and scalable strategy for promoting critical health literacy and countering health misinformation in the general public.