# Economical Perovskite Solar Cell Enabled by Triple Cost‐Reduction Strategies

**Authors:** Kanokwan Choodam, Nattawut Kamjam, Noppawit Sukpan, Chaowaphat Seriwattanachai, Anuchytt Inna, KoKo Shin Thant, Ladda Srathongsian, Ratchadaporn Supruangnet, Hideki Nakajima, Anusit Kaewprajak, Pisist Kumnorkaew, Duangmanee Wongratanaphisan, Pipat Ruankham, Pasit Pakawatpanurut, Pongsakorn Kanjanaboos

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/smsc.202500451 · Small Science · 2026-01-19

## TL;DR

This paper introduces cost-effective perovskite solar cells for indoor IoT devices using three strategies to reduce material and production costs.

## Contribution

The study proposes a triple cost-reduction strategy using dual absorber layers, spray-coating, and carbon electrodes for perovskite solar cells.

## Key findings

- The dual absorber layer improves charge transport and reduces the need for hole transport layers.
- Spray-coating under ambient conditions minimizes solution waste and enables large-scale production.
- Carbon electrodes reduce material costs to $11.98 m−2 and achieve a low m-LCOE-i of 1.54 ¢ Wh−1.

## Abstract

Perovskite solar cells (PSCs) are emerging as a promising technology for indoor photovoltaics due to their high efficiency and cost‐effective manufacturing. In this article, three strategies are explored to reduce costs and enable perovskite materials (PSK) as power sources for indoor internet of things (IoTs): 1) using dual perovskite absorber layer (PSK1/polyethylene glycol (PEG)/PSK2) to replace both the absorber and hole transport layers, 2) utilizing spray‐coating for perovskite deposition under ambient conditions with 45%–65% relative humidity (RH), and 3) replacing metal electrodes with carbon electrodes. The dual absorber layer improves charge transport, while the spray‐coating process minimizes solution waste, making large‐scale production more feasible. Additionally, the use of PEG as an interlayer effectively enhances defect passivation, improving charge transport and stability. The proposed carbon‐based device architecture offers the lowest material cost ($11.98 m−2) and the modified levelized cost of electricity for indoor light (m‐LCOE‐i) of 1.54 ¢ Wh−1, outperforming traditional Spiro‐OMeTAD/Au or carbon designs along with enhancing the commercial viability of PSCs. To demonstrate its practicality, connected PSCs are utilized to power IoT devices for over a month under typical laboratory lighting conditions (300–400 lux) at 40%–65% RH.

Perovskite solar cells (PSCs) serve as cost‐effective power sources for indoor internet of things devices. The dual absorber layer improves charge transport, while the spray‐coating process minimizes solution waste and opens door for large‐scale production. Additionally, the use of polyethylene glycol as an interlayer effectively enhances defect passivation, improving charge transport and stability. The carbon‐based PSC architecture delivers competitive cost of electricity for indoor usage.© 2026 WILEY‐VCH GmbH

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** polyethylene glycol (PubChem CID 9033), Spiro-OMeTAD (PubChem CID 16161850)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** Perovskite (MESH:C059910), carbon (MESH:D002244), PSK1 (-), PEG (MESH:D011092), Au (MESH:D006046)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12850025/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12850025/full.md

## References

92 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12850025/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12850025