# The benefits and future potential of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) on mental health: a Delphi study

**Authors:** Chit Thet Lal Oo, Walton Wider, Nicholas Tze Ping Pang, Eugene Boon Yau Koh, Rajkumar Krishnan Vasanthi, Khine Zar Zar Thet, Rodrigo Ramalho, Bilge Nur Özdemir, Kashmine Mahboob

PMC · DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2026.2621802 · International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being · 2026-01-27

## TL;DR

Experts believe generative AI can improve mental health care by increasing access and personalization, but ethical and usability concerns must be addressed for successful adoption.

## Contribution

This study identifies expert consensus on the benefits and future potential of GAI in mental health using a Delphi method.

## Key findings

- Accessibility and availability were ranked as the most important current benefit of GAI in mental health.
- Experts prioritized GAI as a collaborative and informative tool for future applications.
- Consensus was achieved on the transformative potential of GAI, contingent on ethical governance and usability.

## Abstract

This study explores expert consensus on the benefits and future potential of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in mental health care, using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to interpret these perceptions.

A two-round Delphi study using a mixed-methods design was conducted with 15 purposively selected experts in psychiatry, clinical psychology, counselling, and digital mental health. Round 1 gathered open-ended responses that were thematically analysed to identify benefit and future-potential dimensions. In Round 2, experts ranked these dimensions, and consensus was assessed using Kendall’s coefficient of concordance.

Twenty-eight themes were identified across eight benefit dimensions, and 29 themes across eight future-potential dimensions. Statistically significant consensus was achieved for both benefits (W = 0.145, p = 0.034) and future potential (W = 0.152, p = 0.025). Accessibility and availability ranked as the most important current benefit, while AI as a collaborative and informative tool was prioritised for future application.

Experts perceived GAI as a transformative adjunct to mental health practice, particularly in expanding access, supporting personalised care, and augmenting professional capacity. Adoption is contingent on usability, transparency, trust, and robust ethical governance to ensure equitable and human-centred integration.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** depression (MESH:D003866), anxiety (MESH:D001007), burnout (MESH:D002055), psychiatric (MESH:D001523), fatigue (MESH:D005221), Crisis (MESH:D001752), AI (MESH:C538142)
- **Chemicals:** GAI (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12849804/full.md

## References

68 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12849804/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12849804