# Multicentre Collaborative Prospective Cohort Study Investigating the Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on Kidney Transplant Outcomes: The CRAFT Study

**Authors:** Ruth Owen, Georgios Kourounis, Bishow Karki, Katie Connor, Charlotte Brown, Kayani Kayani, Mohamed Elzawahry, Ruth Blanco, Davide Schilirò, Paul Smith, Jenny Mehew, Miriam Manook, Carrie Scuffell, Aimen Amer, Samuel Tingle, Emily R. Thompson

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/ti.2025.15541 · Transplant International · 2026-01-14

## TL;DR

This study found that formal ERAS protocols in kidney transplants do not reduce complications or hospital stays, suggesting a focus on pre-transplant care for better outcomes.

## Contribution

The study is the first multicenter investigation of ERAS in kidney transplantation, revealing no benefit from formal ERAS protocols and highlighting the need for prehabilitation.

## Key findings

- Formal ERAS protocols were not associated with reduced complications, length of stay, or readmissions.
- Most UK transplant centers already use ERAS-like care, indicating widespread adoption of its principles.
- Frailer patients had longer hospital stays and more readmissions, suggesting pre-transplant interventions are needed.

## Abstract

Perioperative complications are common in kidney transplantation. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a well-established multimodal perioperative care pathway designed to improve patient outcomes, however, its efficacy in renal transplant remains poorly described. Participating centres included adult renal transplant recipients and 30-day follow-up data. The primary outcome was LOS. Multivariable hierarchical models compared cohorts. 213 patients were included in the study period. 18/23 UK kidney transplant centres were represented. Analysis of the perioperative care delivery demonstrated similar patterns irrespective of reported protocols, with a tendency towards ERAS-type care. Between cohorts, the incidence of complications were similar; formal ERAS 14.3%, ERAS informal 17.0%, no ERAS 12.6%; p = 0.64. Median LOS was also similar; formal ERAS 6.0 days (5.0–11.5), informal ERAS 7.0 days (5.0–10.5) vs. no ERAS 6.0 days (5.0–10.5); p = 0.75. Readmissions were comparable; p = 0.721. Multivariable models confirmed these findings and demonstrated frailer patients had longer LOS and more readmissions. Currently, most UK renal transplant centres deliver a form of peri-operative ERAS care, indicating broad adoption of ERAS principles. Consequently, a formal ERAS protocol is not associated with decreased complications, LOS or readmissions. Efforts to improve outcomes should focus on prehabilitation of at-risk groups on the waiting list.

Multicenter collaborative study on enhanced recovery after kidney transplant, involving 18 UK transplant units. Graphs show length of stay, post-op complications, readmissions, and 30-day GFR across ERAS groups. Key points include comparable outcomes and widespread ERAS adoption. Lack of prehabilitation interventions noted. Study by Ruth Owen et al., published in Transpl. Int. 2025.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12849761/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12849761/full.md

## References

26 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12849761/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12849761