# COPD-patients’ perspective on adherence to therapy and its integration into a systematic literature review

**Authors:** Maximilian Zimmermann, Doreen Kroppen, Omar Ammous, Daniel S Majorski, Melanie P Berger, Sarah B Stanzel, Johannes F Holle, Falk Schumacher, Tim Matthes, Wolfram Windisch, Maximilian Wollsching-Strobel

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s12890-026-04102-8 · BMC Pulmonary Medicine · 2026-01-13

## TL;DR

This study explores COPD patients' views on therapy adherence and integrates these insights into a systematic review of interventions to improve adherence.

## Contribution

The novel aspect is integrating patient perspectives from focus groups into a systematic literature review on COPD therapy adherence.

## Key findings

- Six propositions based on patient perspectives were developed to guide future scientific work.
- Enhancing patient self-efficacy and access to medical information were identified as key factors for improving adherence.
- Focus group interviews proved effective in complementing systematic literature reviews with patient-centered insights.

## Abstract

Patient involvement in scientific research is becoming increasingly important to ensure a patient-centered approach to medicine. The objective of this study is twofold: firstly, to ascertain patients’ perspectives on adherence to therapy and secondly, to integrate this information into a systematic review (SR) on interventions to improve adherence in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

In parallel with the SR, two focus group interviews with a COPD self-help group were conducted using semi-structured interview guidelines. The interviews were analyzed using computer-assisted qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz with the aim of complementing the results of the systematic literature review and to develop propositions for further scientific use.

The first focus group interview comprising 321 codes included 14 (mean age 67.7 ± 6.8 years; 71.4% female) and the second interview comprising 139 codes included 10 (mean age 68,5 ± 8,2 years; 50% female) patients. Ten categories of the content analysis informed the logic models and the applicability analysis of the SR and six propositions representing the patient’s perspective were developed for further scientific use: Main themes were (I) Enhancement of patient’s self-efficacy (II) Access to trusted medical information (III) Patient-physician relationship (IV) Measures to improve adherence (V) Sociocultural/medical environment (VI) Methods to measure adherence.

The inclusion of the patient perspective in an SR can be successfully achieved by conducting focus group interviews. Multimodal measures aimed at enhancing patient’s self-efficacy helping them to achieve individual goals reinforces adherence to therapy from a patient’s perspective.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-026-04102-8.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (MONDO:0005002), COPD (MONDO:0005002)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** asthma (MESH:D001249), disability (MESH:D009069), Inhale (MESH:D015208), Anxiety (MESH:D001007), COPD (MESH:D029424), deaths (MESH:D003643), cognitive or physical impairments (MESH:D003072), chronic diseases (MESH:D002908)
- **Chemicals:** oxygen (MESH:D010100)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12849637/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12849637/full.md

## References

4 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12849637/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12849637