# Learning effects during balance analysis on a modified posturomed-platform in healthy dogs

**Authors:** Wolszky Viola, Zablotski Yury, Lauer Susanne

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s12917-025-05257-y · BMC Veterinary Research · 2026-01-08

## TL;DR

This study found that healthy dogs show learning effects during dynamic balance tests but not during static tests on a modified balance platform.

## Contribution

The study is the first to investigate learning effects in posturography for healthy dogs using a modified platform.

## Key findings

- No significant learning effects were observed during static posturography.
- COP parameters decreased significantly during slow-dynamic posturography between the first and second time points.
- Fast-dynamic posturography showed significant decreases in COP parameters across time points, indicating training effects.

## Abstract

Posturographic balance assessments are increasingly used in veterinary medicine, yet potential learning effects during evaluation remain unstudied. This study investigated learning effects in static, slow-dynamic, and fast-dynamic posturography using a modified Posturomed platform in healthy dogs.

Healthy adult dogs (n = 20) were positioned longitudinally on a pressure sensitive modified balance platform (Posturomed-FDM-JS, Zebris, Isny, Germany). Five static, slow-dynamic and fast-dynamic posturographic trials were recorded (duration: 20s) and repeated three times over three weeks. Center of pressure (COP) parameters—COP-path-length (PL, mm), 95% COP-confidence-ellipse-area (CEA, mm2) and COP-average-velocity (AV, mm/sec) were analyzed over five steady-state 5-s intervals per trial. Data were analyzed using generalised linear or robust linear mixed-effects models with random effects on the individual dog; p-values were adjusted using the Tukey method for multiple comparisons.

Under static conditions, none of the COP-parameters differed significantly across time points (all p-values > 0.448). Under slow-dynamic conditions, all COP-parameters decreased significantly between time points 1 and 2 (all p values < 0.0007) but remained stable thereafter (all p-values > 0.159). Under fast-dynamic conditions, all COP-parameters decreased significantly from time point to time point (all p-values < 0.034), except for CEA between time points 1 and 3 (p = 0.0759) and 2 and 3 (p = 0.999). Differences among trials occurred only at the first time point under dynamic conditions and were more pronounced under fast-dynamic conditions.

No learning effects were observed during static posturography in healthy adult dogs. However, training effects must be considered in both slow- and fast-dynamic posturography.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12917-025-05257-y.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Canis lupus familiaris (dog, subspecies) [taxon 9615]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12849616/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12849616/full.md

## References

6 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12849616/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12849616