# Proportion and antibiogram of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

**Authors:** Ahmed Azzam, Heba Khaled, Ahmed Salem, Muhamad Sayed, Abdelmarouf Mohieldein, Mohamed S. Elsayed, Enas Mohamed Lotfy, Hend H. A. M. Abdullah, Fatma E. Hassan, Hassan Marei, Nouran Hassan, Elham Abdulnaby, Gellan Alaa Mohamed Kamel, Ismael Osman, Mohamed Ahmed Reda, Dina Ismail, Mahmoud Nazih, Haitham Salem, Amar Basil, Dina Rady

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s13756-025-01687-3 · Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control · 2026-01-21

## TL;DR

This study finds that about 42% of Staphylococcus aureus infections in Africa are methicillin-resistant, with significant regional differences and high resistance to several antibiotics.

## Contribution

This is the first comprehensive meta-analysis of MRSA proportions and antibiotic resistance profiles across Africa, highlighting regional disparities and resistance trends.

## Key findings

- The pooled proportion of MRSA in Africa is 42.2%, with Northern Africa having a significantly higher rate than Sub-Saharan Africa.
- Resistance rates to clindamycin, trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline exceed 40%, while linezolid and vancomycin resistance remain relatively low but concerning.
- Eritrea and Egypt report the highest MRSA proportions (71.8% and 61.8%, respectively), while Malawi and Gabon have the lowest.

## Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major public health concern, particularly in resource-limited settings such as Africa. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the proportion of MRSA among S. aureus isolates from patients with confirmed infections and to assess associated antibiotic resistance profiles across the continent.

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in African Journals Online, African Index Medicus, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science for studies published between January 1, 2013, and June 5, 2024. Primary studies were included if they reported MRSA proportion or resistance profiles in Africa, employed reliable detection techniques, and analyzed clinical specimens from infected patients. Statistical analyses were performed using the meta package in R software, applying a random-effects model. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

This meta-analysis included 191 studies, encompassing 40,979 S. aureus isolates. Nigeria contributed the highest number of studies (n = 29), followed by Egypt (n = 26). The vast majority of studies (n = 186) were based on hospital settings. The pooled proportion of MRSA in Africa was 42.2% (95% CI 38.7–45.6). By detection method, proportion was 41.4% for mecA, 42.8% for the cefoxitin disc method, and 39.1% for the oxacillin disc method, with no significant differences observed (p = 0.8). Regionally, Northern Africa had a significantly higher proportion of 56.2% (95% CI 49.3–62.9) compared with 36.7% (95% CI 33.2–40.4) in Sub-Saharan Africa (p < 0.001). At the country level, Eritrea reported the highest proportion (71.8%), followed by Egypt (61.8%), while the lowest rates were observed in Malawi (7.0%) and Gabon (8.2%). Regarding MRSA resistance profiles, linezolid (3.4%) and vancomycin (4.7%) showed the lowest resistance rates, whereas higher rates were noted for fusidic acid (11.6%), rifampin (28.4%), clindamycin (40.4%), trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (54.5%), and tetracycline (60.2%). Limited data were available for telavancin, dalbavancin, oritavancin, tedizolid, ceftaroline, mupirocin, and daptomycin.

The proportion of MRSA in Africa remains high at 42.2%, with marked regional disparities. Although resistance rates for linezolid and vancomycin are relatively low, they surpass global averages, raising concerns about emerging resistance. Alarmingly high resistance rates to several other antibiotics further underscore the urgent need for targeted interventions and continuous surveillance.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13756-025-01687-3.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** linezolid (PubChem CID 3929), vancomycin (PubChem CID 14969), fusidic acid (PubChem CID 3000226), rifampin (PubChem CID 135398735), clindamycin (PubChem CID 446598), trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (PubChem CID 358641), tetracycline (PubChem CID 54675776), telavancin (PubChem CID 3081362), dalbavancin (PubChem CID 16134627), oritavancin (PubChem CID 16136912), tedizolid (PubChem CID 11234049), ceftaroline (PubChem CID 9852981), mupirocin (PubChem CID 446596), daptomycin (PubChem CID 21585658)
- **Species:** Staphylococcus aureus (taxon 1280)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** AMR (MESH:D060467), infected (MESH:D007239), MRSA (MESH:D013203), CDD (MESH:D013736), bloodstream infections (MESH:D018805), Skin and soft tissue infections (MESH:D018461), Infectious Diseases (MESH:D003141), Urinary tract infections (MESH:D014552), Antibiotic (MESH:D004761)
- **Chemicals:** mupirocin (MESH:D016712), telavancin (MESH:C487637), beta-lactam (MESH:D047090), tetracycline (MESH:D013752), clindamycin (MESH:D002981), vancomycin (MESH:D014640), tedizolid (MESH:C546016), trimethoprim (MESH:D014295), ceftaroline (MESH:C490727), ISO (-), TMP-SMX (MESH:D015662), Linezolid (MESH:D000069349), Oxacillin (MESH:D010068), fusidic acid (MESH:D005672), mecA (MESH:C046756), penicillin (MESH:D010406), Methicillin (MESH:D008712), rifampin (MESH:D012293), dalbavancin (MESH:C469289), oritavancin (MESH:C100708), Cefoxitin (MESH:D002440), daptomycin (MESH:D017576)
- **Species:** Staphylococcus aureus (species) [taxon 1280], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12849242/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12849242/full.md

## References

14 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12849242/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12849242