Sociodemographic, Reproductive, and Clinical Profile of Patients With an Unhealthy Cervix: An Observational Study
Shubhalaxmi Nene, Indrani Dutta, Moumita Kundu

TL;DR
This study examines the characteristics of women with cervical abnormalities in India, highlighting the link between unhealthy cervix and socioeconomic factors.
Contribution
The study provides new insights into the sociodemographic and clinical profile of cervical disease in Central and Eastern India.
Findings
Most patients with an unhealthy cervix were from rural areas and lower socioeconomic classes.
Abnormal Pap test results were significantly associated with factors like illiteracy and multiple sexual partners.
Cervical erosion was the most common diagnosis, followed by premalignant conditions in 9.3% of cases.
Abstract
Background Cervical cancer is a major public health challenge in India. The term "unhealthy cervix" encompasses a spectrum of cervical abnormalities detectable through visual examination, ranging from inflammatory conditions to premalignant and malignant lesions. This study was conducted with the aim of describing the sociodemographic, reproductive, and clinical characteristics of patients presenting with an unhealthy cervix at tertiary care centers in Central and Eastern India. Methods This hospital-based observational study was conducted from March 2025 to August 2025 at two tertiary care hospitals. A total of 280 women aged 21-65 years presenting with complaints suggestive of an unhealthy cervix were enrolled using consecutive sampling. Data on sociodemographic characteristics, reproductive history, and clinical presentation were collected using a predesigned proforma. All…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Characteristics | Categories | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) |
| Age (years) | ≤30 | 68 | 24.3 |
| 31-40 | 119 | 42.5 | |
| 41-50 | 64 | 22.9 | |
| 51-60 | 23 | 8.2 | |
| >60 | 6 | 2.1 | |
| Residence | Rural | 163 | 58.2 |
| Urban | 117 | 41.8 | |
| Literacy | Literate | 134 | 47.9 |
| Illiterate | 146 | 52.1 | |
| Socioeconomic status | Class I (upper class) | 12 | 4.3 |
| Class II (upper middle class) | 23 | 8.2 | |
| Class III (middle class) | 52 | 18.6 | |
| Class IV (lower middle class) | 118 | 42.1 | |
| Class V (lower class) | 75 | 26.8 | |
| Parity | Nulliparous | 18 | 6.4 |
| Primiparous | 47 | 16.8 | |
| Multiparous | 215 | 76.8 | |
| Teenage pregnancy | Yes | 35 | 12.5 |
| Multiple sexual partners | Yes | 10 | 3.6 |
| Past history of sexually transmitted infections | Yes | 25 | 8.9 |
| Long-term use of oral contraceptive pills (≥5 years) | Yes | 51 | 18.2 |
| Characteristics | Categories | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) |
| Presenting complaints* | White vaginal discharge | 152 | 54.3 |
| Foul-smelling discharge | 53 | 18.9 | |
| Blood-stained discharge | 38 | 13.6 | |
| Intermenstrual bleeding | 80 | 28.6 | |
| Post-coital bleeding | 43 | 15.4 | |
| Post-menopausal bleeding | 35 | 12.5 | |
| Pelvic pain | 62 | 22.1 | |
| Pap test findings | Normal | 79 | 28.2 |
| Benign inflammation | 175 | 62.5 | |
| ASCUS | 10 | 3.6 | |
| LSIL | 9 | 3.2 | |
| HSIL | 7 | 2.5 |
| Diagnosis | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) |
| Physiological leukorrhea | 49 | 17.5 |
| Non-specific vaginitis | 24 | 8.6 |
| Bacterial vaginosis | 44 | 15.7 |
| Candidal vaginitis | 39 | 13.9 |
| Cervical erosion | 75 | 26.8 |
| Chronic pelvic inflammatory disease | 18 | 6.4 |
| Cervical polyp | 5 | 1.8 |
| Premalignant conditions (ASCUS/LSIL/HSIL) | 26 | 9.3 |
| Characteristics | Total | Normal/benign inflammation (n = 254) | Abnormal Pap test (n = 26) | p-value# |
| Age (years) | - | 38.5 ± 9.1 | 39.8 ± 10.3 | 0.487 |
| Residence | ||||
| Rural | 163 | 145 (57.1) | 18 (69.2) | 0.232 |
| Urban | 117 | 109 (42.9) | 8 (30.8) | |
| Literacy | ||||
| Literate | 134 | 127 (50.0) | 7 (26.9) | 0.015* |
| Illiterate | 146 | 127 (50.0) | 19 (73.1) | |
| Socioeconomic status | ||||
| Class I/II/III | 87 | 83 (32.7) | 4 (15.4) | 0.042* |
| Class IV/V | 193 | 171 (67.3) | 22 (84.6) | |
| Parity | ||||
| Nulliparous/primiparous | 65 | 59 (23.2) | 6 (23.1) | 0.984 |
| Multiparous | 215 | 195 (76.8) | 20 (76.9) | |
| Teenage pregnancy | ||||
| Yes | 35 | 28 (11.0) | 7 (26.9) | 0.018* |
| No | 245 | 226 (89.0) | 19 (73.1) | |
| Multiple sexual partners | ||||
| Yes | 10 | 6 (2.4) | 4 (15.4) | 0.003* |
| No | 270 | 248 (97.6) | 22 (84.6) | |
| History of STI | ||||
| Yes | 25 | 17 (6.7) | 8 (30.8) | <0.001* |
| No | 255 | 237 (93.3) | 18 (69.2) | |
| Long-term OCP use | ||||
| Yes | 51 | 41 (16.1) | 10 (38.5) | 0.006* |
| No | 229 | 213 (83.9) | 16 (61.5) | |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCervical Cancer and HPV Research · Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis · Reproductive tract infections research
Introduction
Cervical cancer is a major public health concern in India, being the second most common cancer among women and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality [1]. Despite being largely preventable through early detection and screening, the burden disproportionately affects low- and middle-income countries, where approximately 94% of cervical cancer deaths occur annually [2]. India accounts for approximately one-quarter of the global cervical cancer burden, with cervical cancer constituting 18.3% of new cases of cancer and 9.4% of all malignancies among women in 2020 [1,3].
The term "unhealthy cervix" refers to a clinical assessment made through visual examination, where the cervix exhibits abnormal features such as unusual growth patterns, ulceration, or aberrant vascular appearance [4]. Recognition of an unhealthy cervix through routine examination serves as a critical entry point for further diagnostic evaluation and timely intervention [3]. The prevalence is particularly pronounced among rural women of low socioeconomic status and those residing in urban slums, who face multiple risk factors including early marriage, multiparity, poor nutritional status, limited contraceptive awareness, and inadequate access to screening programs [4-6].
The Papanicolaou test, also known as the Pap test, has been the cornerstone of cervical cancer screening for decades, offering high specificity and being cost-effective, non-invasive, and easily implementable [7,8]. However, its sensitivity for detecting precancerous lesions remains suboptimal, particularly in resource-limited settings [9]. Understanding the sociodemographic and clinical profile of women presenting with an unhealthy cervix is essential for planning targeted screening and intervention strategies for cervical cancer prevention and control. Therefore, this study was conducted to describe the sociodemographic, reproductive, and clinical profile of patients presenting with an unhealthy cervix at tertiary care centers.
Materials and methods
We undertook an observational study over six months from March 2025 to August 2025, which was carried out simultaneously at two tertiary care hospitals: one in Bhilai, Chhattisgarh (Central India), and another in Jamshedpur, Jharkhand (Eastern India), specifically in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Abhishek I Mishra Memorial Medical College and Research and Manipal Tata Medical College. The study included women aged 21-65 years presenting to the Gynaecology and Obstetrics outpatient departments with complaints suggestive of an unhealthy cervix, such as vaginal discharge, menstrual disorders, post-coital bleeding, post-menopausal bleeding, and intermenstrual bleeding. Women not providing informed written consent, those with active severe vaginal bleeding at the time of examination, pregnant women, women with frank invasive cervical cancer on clinical examination, and those with a previous history of cervical malignancy or treatment for cervical lesions were excluded from the study.
During the study period, a consecutive sampling strategy was used to enroll 280 patients from both institutions who met the eligibility criteria. Data were collected using a predesigned, pretested proforma encompassing demographic and clinical data, clinical examination procedures, and screening diagnostic procedures. All participants underwent a comprehensive per speculum examination to assess cervical and vaginal conditions. Presenting complaints, including the nature of vaginal discharge, abnormal bleeding patterns, and other gynecological symptoms, were systematically recorded. Following informed consent and clinical examination, a Pap smear was obtained by a trained gynecologist from all participants, following which the cervical samples were sent to the Department of Pathology. The slides were evaluated by two independent pathologists, and in cases of discordant results, a consensus was reached through joint discussion. Results were reported according to the Bethesda System [10]. Positive Pap test results were defined as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), or invasive cancer. The final diagnosis was based on clinical findings, Pap test results, and additional investigations as warranted.
Microsoft Excel 2016 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, US) was used to organize the data, while SPSS version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, US) was used for analysis. Categorical variables were shown as frequencies and percentages, while continuous variables were given as mean ± standard deviation. For continuous variables, the independent sample t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were utilized; for categorical variables, the Chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test were utilized. The threshold for statistical significance was established at p < 0.05.
The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committees of both participating hospitals prior to initiation of data collection. All participants were provided detailed information about the study purpose, and written informed consent was obtained in local languages.
Results
Final analysis was conducted on 280 patients who met the eligibility criteria and completed all study procedures. Table 1 presents the sociodemographic and reproductive characteristics of the study participants. The mean age of participants was 38.6 ± 9.2 years, with the majority (n = 119, 42.5%) aged between 31 and 40 years. More than half of the participants (n = 163, 58.2%) were from rural areas. A substantial proportion were illiterate (n = 146, 52.1%), and 197 participants (68.9%) belonged to lower socioeconomic classes (Classes IV and V).
Regarding reproductive characteristics, the majority of participants were multiparous (n = 215, 76.8%). Teenage pregnancy was reported by 35 participants (12.5%). A history of multiple sexual partners was reported by 10 participants (3.6%), while 25 reported a past history of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) (8.9%). Long-term oral contraceptive pill (OCP) use (≥5 years) was reported by 51 participants (18.2%) (Table 1).
Table 2 summarizes the presenting complaints and Pap test findings among study participants. White vaginal discharge was the most common presenting complaint (n = 152, 54.3%). Blood-tinged discharge was reported by 38 participants (13.6%). Pap test examination revealed that the majority (n = 175, 62.5%) had benign inflammatory changes. Normal cytology was found in 79 participants (28.2%). Abnormal Pap test results included ASCUS (n = 10, 3.6%), LSIL (n = 9, 3.2%), and HSIL (n = 7, 2.5%).
The most frequently occurring conditions were cervical erosion (26.8%) and bacterial vaginosis (15.7%). Candidal vaginitis was diagnosed in 39 participants (13.9%). Premalignant conditions (ASCUS/LSIL/HSIL) were identified in 26 participants (9.3%) (Table 3).
Table 4 identifies factors associated with cervical premalignant and malignant conditions (abnormal Pap test results). Compared to those with normal or benign inflammatory Pap test results, a significantly higher proportion of patients with abnormal Pap test results belonged to lower socioeconomic classes (84.6% vs. 67.3%; p = 0.042), were illiterate (73.1% vs. 49.8%; p = 0.015), had teenage pregnancy (26.9% vs. 11.1%; p = 0.018), reported having multiple sexual partners (15.4% vs. 2.5%; p = 0.003), had past history of STI (30.8% vs. 7.1%; p < 0.001), and reported long-term use of OCP (38.5% vs. 16.3%; p = 0.006).
*Table 4: Factors associated with cervical premalignant and malignant conditions (abnormal Pap test) (N = 280)Values are presented as n (%) or mean ± SD#p-value was calculated using the Chi-squared test (for categorical variables) and Mann-Whitney U test (for age)p < 0.05 is considered statistically significantSTI: sexually transmitted infection; OCP: oral contraceptive pills; SD: standard deviation
Discussion
The mean age of participants was 38.6 ± 9.2 years, with the majority aged 31-40 years, consistent with previous studies [11-13]. This distribution reflects peak reproductive years when women experience cumulative exposure to risk factors, including human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, hormonal influences, and consequences of multiple pregnancies, underscoring the importance of targeted screening programs for women in their third and fourth decades.
A striking finding in our study was that more than half of the participants (58.2%) were from rural areas, where women face multiple barriers, including geographical distance from facilities, lack of transportation, financial constraints, and limited health literacy. This emphasizes the urgent need for mobile screening units, community-based education programs, and strengthened primary healthcare infrastructure in rural areas.
Over half of the participants were illiterate and belonged to lower socioeconomic classes, consistent with studies establishing strong associations between low socioeconomic status, illiteracy, and increased cervical cancer risk [14]. Lower socioeconomic status is linked to poor hygiene practices, limited healthcare access, delayed presentation, higher prevalence of concurrent infections, malnutrition, and reduced awareness about preventive measures. Illiteracy compounds these challenges by limiting women's ability to understand health information and navigate healthcare systems effectively.
The vast majority were multiparous. Multiparity increases cervical cancer risk through hormonal changes during pregnancy, cervical trauma during deliveries, pregnancy-associated immunosuppression, and prolonged HPV exposure. Muñoz et al. [15] demonstrated a dose-response relationship, with women having seven or more pregnancies showing a 3.8-fold increased risk compared to nulliparous women.
Teenage pregnancy, defined as first pregnancy before 18 years of age, was reported by 12.5% of participants in our study. Early age at first pregnancy is a well-established risk factor for cervical cancer, as it often serves as a marker for early initiation of sexual activity and prolonged exposure to HPV infection [16]. The cervix during adolescence undergoes active metaplastic transformation in the transformation zone, making it particularly vulnerable to HPV infection and subsequent neoplastic changes [16].
In our study, a history of multiple sexual partners was reported by 3.6% of participants, while 8.9% reported a past history of STIs. These figures likely represent underreporting due to social desirability bias and cultural stigma associated with discussing sexual behavior, particularly in conservative Indian society, where such topics are often considered taboo. Liu et al. [17], in their meta-analysis, found that women with multiple sexual partners had a significantly elevated risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer.
Long-term OCP use (≥5 years) was reported by 18.2% of participants. The association between prolonged OCP use and cervical cancer has been documented in multiple studies, with meta-analyses showing a modest but consistent increase in risk [18]. The International Collaboration of Epidemiological Studies found relative risk of cervical cancer increased with OCP duration, though the risk diminished after discontinuation [19].
White vaginal discharge was the most common complaint (54.3%), consistent with previous studies [13]. High prevalence reflects the inflammatory nature of cervical lesions, concurrent infections, cervical ectopy, and increased mucus production. However, discharge is non-specific and can result from both benign and serious conditions. Abnormal vaginal bleeding was also highly prevalent in our study, with intermenstrual bleeding reported by 28.6%, post-coital bleeding by 15.4%, and post-menopausal bleeding by 12.5% of participants. These bleeding patterns are classic warning signs that should prompt a thorough investigation for cervical pathology. Post-coital bleeding, in particular, has high specificity for cervical lesions, as it results from contact trauma to friable cervical tissue. Post-menopausal bleeding requires especially careful evaluation, as it carries a higher likelihood of malignancy due to the atrophic changes in the genital tract that occur after menopause, making the tissue more susceptible to trauma and infection. Our findings emphasize the importance of comprehensive gynecological examination and appropriate screening for all women presenting with these symptoms.
Pap test examination revealed 62.5% had benign inflammatory changes, 28.2% normal cytology, and 9.3% abnormal results (ASCUS, LSIL, and HSIL). This prevalence of abnormal cytology is higher than what would be expected in a general screening population but is consistent with studies examining symptomatic women or those with a clinically unhealthy cervix [9]. The high proportion of inflammatory Pap smears in our study reflects the burden of cervicovaginal infections in the study population and highlights a significant limitation of cervical cytology in resource-limited settings. Inflammation can obscure cellular details and lead to false-negative results, potentially masking underlying dysplastic changes. This observation supports the argument for combining cytology with other screening modalities such as visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) or HPV testing in symptomatic women to improve detection rates.
Our analysis revealed significant associations between sociodemographic/reproductive factors and premalignant lesions. The association between lower socioeconomic status and abnormal results (p = 0.042) reflects multiple barriers: financial constraints, lack of transportation, competing survival priorities, and limited household decision-making autonomy [14]. The association with illiteracy (p = 0.015) reflects the fundamental role of education in health-seeking behavior. Illiterate women have less awareness of screening options, difficulty understanding health information, challenges navigating healthcare, and greater reliance on traditional practices [20].
The significant associations observed with reproductive and sexual health factors, namely, teenage pregnancy, multiple sexual partners, and history of STIs, are all mechanistically linked to HPV exposure and persistence, the central etiologic factor in cervical carcinogenesis. These findings support the importance of comprehensive sexual health education, promotion of delayed sexual debut, encouragement of barrier contraceptive methods, effective STI prevention and treatment programs, and HPV vaccination for adolescents before sexual debut. The association with long-term OCP use (p = 0.006) adds to the growing body of evidence suggesting that prolonged hormonal contraceptive use may modestly increase cervical cancer risk, particularly in HPV-infected women [18]. This finding should inform contraceptive counseling, emphasizing the importance of regular cervical screening for long-term OCP users while acknowledging the important role of OCPs in preventing unintended pregnancies.
Our study has some limitations that should be acknowledged. The hospital-based design may have introduced selection bias, as women presenting to tertiary care facilities may differ systematically from the general population in terms of disease severity, health-seeking behavior, and socioeconomic characteristics. The cross-sectional design precludes assessment of temporal relationships and causal inferences. Self-reported data on sensitive topics such as sexual history and STI history may be subject to recall bias and social desirability bias, potentially leading to underreporting. Additionally, the study did not include HPV testing, which would have provided valuable information about the prevalence and types of HPV infections in this population. Consequently, the findings should be interpreted with caution, and their generalizability to the broader population may be limited.
Conclusions
This study provides comprehensive data on women presenting with an unhealthy cervix at tertiary care facilities in Central and Eastern India, demonstrating a high burden of cervical pathology, particularly among rural, illiterate, and lower socioeconomic status women. Multiple modifiable risk factors were identified as significantly associated with premalignant lesions. These findings emphasize the urgent need for comprehensive cervical cancer prevention strategies, including population-based screening programs, targeted high-risk interventions, health education campaigns, strengthened rural healthcare infrastructure, and integration of screening with reproductive health services. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies in diverse Indian populations, assess barriers to screening uptake and follow-up, and develop culturally appropriate interventions to improve awareness and coverage. Only through such multi-pronged approaches can we reduce the substantial burden of cervical cancer in India and achieve the global goal of cervical cancer elimination.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Cervical cancer: formulation and implementation of Govt of India guidelines for screening and management Indian J Gynecol Oncol Mehrotra R Yadav K 42020223497733310.1007/s 40944-021-00602-z PMC 8711687 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2World Health Organization. Factsheet: cervical cancer 2024 https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cervical-cancer
- 3Cervical cancer prevention efforts in India: a reality check Journal of Colposcopy and Lower Genital Tract Pathology Shamsunder S Verma S 1522024
- 4A study on unhealthy cervix and its risk factors among currently married women of reproductive age group attending an urban health centre of Kolkata Int J Community Med Public Health Dasgupta A Sinha RN Paul B Bandyopadhyay L Banerjee R Suman S 2133213862019
- 5Burden of cervical cancer and role of screening in India Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol Bobdey S Sathwara J Jain A Balasubramaniam G 2782853720162814409610.4103/0971-5851.195751 PMC 5234166 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Cervical cancer screening in rural India: status & current concepts Indian J Med Res Srivastava AN Misra JS Srivastava S Das BC Gupta S 68769614820183077800210.4103/ijmr.IJMR_5_17PMC 6396551 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Global strategies for cervical cancer prevention and screening Minerva Ginecol Pimple SA Mishra GA 3133207120193080815510.23736/S 0026-4784.19.04397-1 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Cervical cancer screening in resource-constrained countries: current status and future directions Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Gupta R Gupta S Mehrotra R Sodhani P 146114671820172866915210.22034/APJCP.2017.18.6.1461 PMC 6373785 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
