# Understanding the burden and impact of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: exploring therapeutic options and hospital prevention strategies to improve patient outcome at the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali, Rwanda

**Authors:** Samuel Rutare, Florence Masaisa, Théoneste Nkubana, Angelique Dusabe, Jean Bosco Munyemana

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1718336 · Frontiers in Public Health · 2026-01-14

## TL;DR

This study examines the prevalence and antibiotic resistance of MRSA at a hospital in Rwanda, highlighting the need for better infection control and stewardship.

## Contribution

The study provides the first detailed assessment of MRSA burden and resistance patterns at the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali.

## Key findings

- MRSA accounted for 43% of Staphylococcus aureus isolates at the hospital.
- High resistance was observed to ampicillin, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, and tetracycline.
- Vancomycin, linezolid, and other antibiotics showed high effectiveness against MRSA.

## Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains a significant global public health challenge, particularly as a leading cause of nosocomial infections in intensive care units (ICUs). While MRSA prevalence is well documented in many settings, its burden at the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali (CHUK), Rwanda, remains unclear.

To evaluate the burden and impact of MRSA, exploring therapeutic options and hospital prevention strategies to improve patient outcomes.

A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted at CHUK from 1st July 2024 to 30th June 2025 at the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali, in Rwanda. All patients with clinical samples positive for Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) were included. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of isolates were analyzed, and patient clinical records were reviewed.

During the study period, 272 S. aureus isolates were analyzed, of which 117 (43%) were MRSA. The isolates were highly resistant against commonly used antibiotics, including ampicillin (92.7%), erythromycin (49.3%), ciprofloxacin (42.3%), and tetracycline (48.5%). However, they demonstrated high sensitivity to vancomycin, linezolid, teicoplanin, amikacin, daptomycin, and rifampicin.

Staphylococcus aureus infections are common at CHUK, with a high prevalence of MRSA (43%). Effective therapeutic options remain available, but the high resistance to commonly used antibiotics underscores the need for strengthened infection prevention measures and antimicrobial stewardship to improve patient outcomes, especially in critical care services.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** ampicillin (PubChem CID 6249), erythromycin (PubChem CID 12560), ciprofloxacin (PubChem CID 2764), tetracycline (PubChem CID 54675776), vancomycin (PubChem CID 14969), linezolid (PubChem CID 3929), teicoplanin (PubChem CID 133065662), amikacin (PubChem CID 37768), daptomycin (PubChem CID 21585658), rifampicin (PubChem CID 135398735)
- **Species:** Staphylococcus aureus (taxon 1280)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** nosocomial infections (MESH:D003428), infection (MESH:D007239), Staphylococcus aureus infections (MESH:D013203)
- **Chemicals:** Methicillin (MESH:D008712), teicoplanin (MESH:D017334), rifampicin (MESH:D012293), daptomycin (MESH:D017576), ciprofloxacin (MESH:D002939), ampicillin (MESH:D000667), amikacin (MESH:D000583), tetracycline (MESH:D013752), vancomycin (MESH:D014640), erythromycin (MESH:D004917), linezolid (MESH:D000069349)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Staphylococcus aureus (species) [taxon 1280]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12847326/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12847326/full.md

## References

39 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12847326/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12847326