# Effect of ultrasound-guided scalp nerve block on hemodynamics and postoperative agitation in hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage craniotomy patients: a prospective randomized controlled study

**Authors:** Bing Li, Zhifang Cao, Junlong Huang, Ying Chen, Zhihua Li, Weiming Wu, Chuntian Li, Ting Qiu, Juncheng Chen

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1721992 · Frontiers in Neurology · 2026-01-14

## TL;DR

This study shows that combining dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine for scalp nerve blocks improves pain control and reduces complications in brain surgery patients with high blood pressure.

## Contribution

The study introduces a novel analgesic strategy combining dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine for scalp nerve blocks in craniotomy patients.

## Key findings

- Groups B and C showed more stable hemodynamics and lower postoperative pain scores compared to the control group.
- Group C had better analgesic outcomes and reduced anesthetic consumption than Group B.
- Combining dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine lowered adverse reactions and improved recovery.

## Abstract

This study aims to investigate the impact of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine scalp nerve block (SNB) on analgesic effects in patients undergoing craniotomy for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH).

A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted on 120 HICH patients who underwent craniotomy at Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University from May 2022 to April 2024. Patients were randomly divided into three groups: control group (A, no SNB), ropivacaine SNB group (B, 0.5% ropivacaine), and dexmedetomidine-ropivacaine SNB group (C, 0.5% ropivacaine + 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine), with 40 patients in each group. Primary outcomes included intraoperative hemodynamic parameters [mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR)], intraoperative anesthetic consumption, postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, rescue analgesia requirements, and incidence of adverse reactions within 48 h postoperatively.

General characteristics were comparable among the three groups (p > 0.05). Compared with Group A, Groups B and C showed more stable intraoperative MAP and HR (p < 0.05), lower VAS scores at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively (p < 0.01), reduced consumption of propofol and remifentanil (p < 0.01), delayed first rescue analgesia (p < 0.01), fewer rescue analgesia administrations (p < 0.01), and lower incidences of nausea/vomiting and postoperative agitation (p < 0.05). Group C exhibited superior outcomes to Group B in VAS scores (6, 12, 24, and 48 h), anesthetic consumption, and rescue analgesia metrics (p < 0.05), with no significant difference in adverse reactions (p > 0.05).

Dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine for SNB improves postoperative analgesia, stabilizes intraoperative hemodynamics, reduces anesthetic usage and rescue analgesia needs, and lowers the incidence of adverse reactions in HICH craniotomy patients, making it a safe and effective analgesic strategy.

chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2500106043.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** dexmedetomidine (PubChem CID 5311068), ropivacaine (PubChem CID 71273), propofol (PubChem CID 4943), remifentanil (PubChem CID 60815)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** nausea/vomiting (MESH:D020250), HICH (MESH:D020299), cerebral hemorrhage (MESH:D002543), hypertensive (MESH:D006973), scalp nerve block (MESH:D004476), postoperative agitation (MESH:D011595)
- **Chemicals:** Dexmedetomidine (MESH:D020927), ropivacaine (MESH:D000077212), propofol (MESH:D015742), remifentanil (MESH:D000077208)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12847037/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12847037/full.md

## References

27 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12847037/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12847037