# Whole-body vibration as an effective sports competition warm-up: a randomized controlled trial in a young and healthy population

**Authors:** Alessandra Amato, Luca Petrigna, Paulo Roberto dos Santos Amorim, Xu Wenxin, Giuseppe Musumeci

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1722108 · Frontiers in Physiology · 2026-01-14

## TL;DR

A 5-minute warm-up with or without whole-body vibration improved sports performance in young, healthy individuals, but vibration did not offer extra benefits.

## Contribution

Demonstrates that WBV does not provide additional performance benefits compared to a standard warm-up in non-professional athletes.

## Key findings

- Both WBV and sham vibration warm-ups improved jump, reaction time, and flexibility tests.
- WBV did not lead to significantly better performance than the sham vibration or control groups.
- All groups showed performance improvements, but no decrease was observed with WBV.

## Abstract

The long-term effect of training with Whole-Body Vibration (WBV) has been documented to have benefits on health, but its acute role in performance remains unclear. This study evaluated whether a 5-minute WBV warm-up could serve as an effective warm-up to optimize sport performance.

Ninety-three participants healthy, active but not professional athletes, (23.6 ± 5.7 years) were randomized into three groups: control (CG), sham vibration group (SVG), and vibration group (VG). All participants completed tests at two time points (T0 and T1): countermovement jump (CMJ) the primary outcome, reaction time (RT), reactive strength index (RSI), and sit-and-reach (SRT). During assessments, superficial electromyography (sEMG) was recorded to explore potential neuromuscular changes associated with the interventions. Between T0 and T1, the VG performed a 5-minute WBV warm-up, the SVG completed the same warm-up without vibration, and the CG remained at rest.

VG improved in the primary outcome, CMJ (p < 0.01), SRT (p < 0.01), and RT (p < 0.01), while RSI remained unchanged (p > 0.05). SVG showed similar improvements (CMJ (p < 0.01), SRT (p < 0.01), and RT (p < 0.01), RSI (p > 0.05), whereas CG experienced a decline in RSI (p < 0.05). Between-group contrasts at the post-test endpoint for the primary outcome (CMJ) showed no statistical significance (all p > 0.05), a finding consistent across all other variables.

The proposed 5-minute warm-up protocol, whether performed with or without whole-body vibration, effectively enhanced performance in sport-related tests without inducing a performance decrease. However, WBV did not provide additional benefits over the same warm-up performed without vibration.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12847016/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12847016/full.md

## References

51 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12847016/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12847016