# Association between cholecystectomy/gallbladder pathology and colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis

**Authors:** Shirui Li, Yunfan Deng, Sheng Dai, Qi Fan, Dehai Xiong, Xiuyang Li

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1724606 · Frontiers in Oncology · 2026-01-14

## TL;DR

This study finds that gallbladder surgery and gallbladder issues are linked to a higher risk of colorectal polyps, suggesting the need for personalized screening.

## Contribution

The study provides a meta-analysis showing cholecystectomy and gallbladder pathology are significant risk factors for colorectal polyps.

## Key findings

- Cholecystectomy increases colorectal polyp risk by 39%, with East Asians showing nearly double the risk compared to North Americans.
- Gallbladder polyps are more strongly associated with polyp risk than gallbladder stones.
- Adjusting for smoking, alcohol, and BMI strengthens the observed risk estimates.

## Abstract

Gallbladder-related pathologies may influence colorectal carcinogenesis, yet systematic evaluation of their associations with precursor lesions remains limited. This study addresses critical knowledge gaps by investigating the dual-axis relationship between cholecystectomy/gallbladder pathologies and colorectal polyp risk while elucidating geographical and biological effect modifiers.

In accordance with the MOOSE/Cochrane guidelines, 27 observational studies were analysed through PROSPERO (CRD420251012876). Comprehensive meta-analysis was performed to assess the effects of cholecystectomy across polyp subtypes and gallbladder pathology (stones/polyps) associations. Heterogeneity was quantified via I² statistics, and pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated via the DerSimonian–Laird random effects model to account for between-study variance. Subgroup analysis stratified by geography, pathology type, and adjustment model was performed with χ² tests for subgroup differences. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias were assessed through leave-one-out methods, funnel plots and Egger’s test.

Cholecystectomy was associated with a 39% increased risk (OR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.21–1.59), with East Asian populations exhibiting a nearly doubled risk compared with North American populations (OR=1.95(95%CI:1.44-2.63) vs OR=1.16(95%CI:1.00-1.34). Compared with unclassified polyps, adenomas were more strongly associated (OR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.16–1.62). Medium-sized studies (OR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.36–2.11) and those adjusted for health factors (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.12–1.61) yielded higher estimates, whereas dietary adjustment nullified significance. Gallbladder pathology (stones/polyps) conferred a 27% higher risk overall, with gallbladder polyps showing greater risk (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.17–1.38) than stones (OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.08–1.32). Older populations (≥50 years) had stronger associations OR=1.41(95%CI:1.20-1.66) vs OR=1.20(95%CI:1.10-1.30). Adjustment for smoking, alcohol, and BMI strengthened the estimates (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.22–1.68). Sensitivity analysis supported the robustness of the primary findings, particularly for cholecystectomy.

This comprehensive analysis establishes gallbladder status as an independent risk modulator for early colorectal lesions, with cholecystectomy demonstrating the highest risk magnitude. These findings advocate personalized surveillance strategies that integrate gallbladder history, particularly high-risk demographics. The mechanistic synergies between bile acid dysmetabolism and gut microbiota dysbiosis warrant further exploration as preventive targets.

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420251012876.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** adenomas (MESH:D000236), Gallbladder (MESH:D005705), stones (MESH:D007669), colorectal lesions (MESH:D015179), Cholecystectomy (MESH:D017562), colorectal carcinogenesis (MESH:D063646), gallbladder polyps (MESH:D011127), colorectal polyp (MESH:D003111), dysmetabolism (MESH:D024821), microbiota dysbiosis (MESH:D064806)
- **Chemicals:** bile acid (MESH:D001647), alcohol (MESH:D000438)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12847004/full.md

## Figures

8 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12847004/full.md

## References

52 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12847004/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12847004