The novel B-cell epitope peptide vaccine, MAX449, exhibits significant anti-tumor efficacy and enhances the therapeutic effects of PD-1 antibodies on tumors by modulating the activity of PMN-MDSCs
Hong Yang, Xiao Han, Boshao Deng, Yunpei Zhao, Jing Zhao, Yufei Wu, Guokang Liu, Shiyu Zeng, Siyi Wang, Zhejuan Shen, Lulu Wang, Zihan Sun, Wenping Lu, Yuzhang Wu, Jian Chen

TL;DR
A new vaccine called MAX449 shows strong anti-tumor effects and improves PD-1 antibody therapy by reducing harmful immune cells in tumors.
Contribution
MAX449 is a novel B-cell epitope vaccine that enhances PD-1 therapy by modulating PMN-MDSC activity.
Findings
MAX449 induces high C5a antibodies and suppresses tumor growth in mouse models.
The vaccine reduces PMN-MDSC migration and immunosuppressive function via the NF-κB pathway.
MAX449 boosts PD-1 antibody efficacy in both cold and hot tumor models.
Abstract
Rationale: Evidence accumulating across experimental studies and clinical settings supports a central role for the C5a-C5aR signaling axis in promoting tumor progression and immune evasion. Nevertheless, whether a vaccination approach targeting C5a can elicit robust anti-tumor immune responses and suppress tumor growth has not yet been investigated. This research aimed to develop an efficient B-cell peptide epitope vaccine targeting the C5a-C5aR pathway for cancer therapy. Methods: Chimeric C5a B-cell peptide epitope vaccines were synthesized using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and C5a antibodies titers were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Multiple mouse tumor models were employed to evaluate the vaccine's efficacy. The mechanisms of MAX449 were assessed through in vitro and in vivo approaches, incorporating single-cell RNA sequencing…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsImmune cells in cancer · Inflammation biomarkers and pathways · Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Introduction
Although substantial progress has been made in early detection and therapeutic approaches, breast cancer continues to be the most common malignancy in women and ranks as the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality 1. Conventional treatment options include chemotherapy 2, radiotherapy 3 and surgery. However, these therapies are hardly cell-specific most of the time. Immunotherapy is a method by either actively or passively stimulating an immune response specifically directed at tumor, thereby facilitating the suppression and elimination of tumor cells 4. This therapeutic approach harnesses and enhances the immune response, allowing for targeted attacks on malignant cells 5,6. As a result, immunotherapy has emerged as a powerful clinical approach for cancer therapy, with an increasing number of drug approvals and a multitude of therapies undergoing clinical and preclinical development.
Among the diverse immunotherapeutic approaches, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the PD-1 pathway by blocking its interaction with ligands have yielded the most robust clinical outcomes in breast cancer. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted approval to multiple PD-1-targeting monoclonal antibodies for clinical use in breast cancer 7. By antagonizing PD-1 signaling, these agents relieve T-cell suppression, thereby restoring anti-tumor immune responses. However, blockade of PD-1 alone is insufficient to overcome all mechanisms of therapeutic resistance, and a subset of patients exhibits limited clinical benefit from anti-PD-1 treatment. To address this limitation, therapeutic combinations aimed at simultaneously modulating multiple immune pathways have been proposed to enhance the efficacy of PD-1-directed interventions 8. Mechanistically, effective immunotherapeutic synergy relies on both the reactivation of effector T cells and the concurrent depletion of immunosuppressive populations, including myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) or regulatory T cells (Treg). Notably, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition fails to adequately relieve T-cell suppression within the tumor microenvironment, a condition that is often reinforced by the accumulation of MDSCs 9 or Tregs 10. Accumulating evidence reveal that certain breast and colorectal cancer patients do not experience enduring clinical benefits from anti-PD-1 immunotherapy due to the infiltration of PMN-MDSCs within tumor microenvironment 11. Additionally, a subset of melanoma patients receiving PD-1 blockade experiences hyper progression, a phenomenon associated with enhanced accumulation of PMN-MDSCs in the lungs 12. Thus, strategies aimed at reversing tumor-associated immunosuppression may provide a pivotal means to overcome resistance to immunotherapy 13.
C5a, an anaphylatoxin generated as a biologically active proteolytic product during complement activation, plays a significant role in tumor progression by fostering an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in which myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are key contributors 14-16. The complement system, an essential arm of innate immunity, culminates in the proteolytic activation of the key components C3 and C5, leading to the generation of the anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a 17,18. While C5a is primarily recognized as a chemoattractant for proinflammatory leukocytes, emerging evidence reveal its ability to promote tumor progression, leading to a growing interest in complement blockade as a potential cancer treatment strategy 19-24. C5a further influences tumor progression by shaping an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment involving MDSCs 24,25. Increasing evidence from both preclinical models and clinical trials indicates that the C5a-C5aR axis plays a key role in enabling tumors to evade immune surveillance and sustain growth, and that disruption of C5a-C5aR interactions has shown promising antitumor efficacy 21. Collectively, these findings underscore the essential involvement of C5a-C5aR signaling in antitumor immune regulation and suggest this axis as a viable therapeutic intervention within checkpoint inhibitor strategies.
Monoclonal antibodies targeting C5a and its receptor C5aR have demonstrated enhanced anti-tumor effects in cancer patients 26,27. Several Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved C5a-C5aR mAbs, including GOHIBIC™ (Vilobelimab), avdoralimab (IPH 5401) 26, and 607 TJ210 (MOR210) 27, are currently undergoing clinical trials as checkpoint inhibitors for cancer treatment. Monoclonal antibodies targeting C5a or C5aR have demonstrated encouraging efficacy in pre-clinical and initial clinical settings; however, their successful clinical implementation is hampered by low overall response rates, treatment-related toxicities, development of resistance, and high manufacturing costs 28. Therefore, there is an urgent demand for novel therapeutic strategies. B-cell epitope-based chimeric peptides containing a broadly reactive T-cell epitope are utilized in active immunotherapy, eliciting a polyclonal antibody response 28. This approach offers a safer and more cost-effective therapeutic advantage compared to monoclonal antibodies 28.
In the present study, two novel C5a-targeted chimeric B-cell peptide epitope vaccines were developed, named MAX449 and MAX450, aimed at inducing polyclonal antibodies against the C5a-C5aR signaling pathway. To validate the efficacy of the most promising C5a B-cell epitope vaccine, we utilized multiple tumor models, including (i) BALB/c mice bearing 4T1 breast tumors and CT26 colon carcinoma, and (ii) C57BL/6 mice implanted with B16F10 melanoma to assess the impact of the C5a B-cell peptide epitope vaccines. Results demonstrated that MAX449 effectively suppressed tumor progression across multiple models. Notably, MAX449 markedly augmented the therapeutic efficacy of PD-1 antibody in multiple mouse models. Furthermore, we discovered that MAX449 exhibited its antitumor activity by inhibiting the migration of PMN-MDSCs to the tumor microenvironment, mediated by NF-κB-dependent downregulation of the atypical chemerin receptor CCRL2. Additionally, MAX449 suppressed the immunosuppressive functions of PMN-MDSCs by reducing IL-1β production by the NF-kB signaling pathway. Collectively, this newly constructed C5a B-cell epitope vaccine presents a promising and enhanced treatment option for patients exhibiting poor responses to anti-PD-1 treatment.
Materials and Methods
Peptide synthesis
Based on the C5a vaccines (KLH-C-KDMQLGR) 29, we modified its helper T cell epitope. Two chimeric C5a vaccines were generated by linking the C5a B-cell epitope sequence (KDMQLGR) to either the measles virus fusion peptide MVF (aa 288-302, KLLSLIKGVIVHRLEGVE) or the tetanus toxoid-derived peptide TT3 (aa 947-967, FNNFTVSFWLRVPKVSASHL) using a four-residue GPSL spacer 28. All C5a B-cell epitope peptide was synthesized and purified using solid phase peptide synthesis and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to ensure purity and quality, purchased from PeptideValley (Nanjing, China). Three-dimensional modeling of peptide secondary structures was performed with PyMOL software (version 2.4.0; Schrödinger, New York, NY, USA) according to the PyMOL User's Manual: https://pymol.org.
Animals: C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice
Housing and experimental use of C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice complied with the biosafety regulations of Army Medical University. Transgenic PyMT (MMTV-PyMT) mice were commercially obtained (Shanghai Model Organisms Center, Inc (stock no. 6688265. SH), and breeding was maintained on C57BL/6 and PyMT (MMTV-PyMT) backgrounds. All in vivo experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of Army Medical University (AMUWEC20230445).
Animal immunization
Immunization followed a 4-times interval strategy 29. One milligram of peptide (SEQ ID NO.7, MAX449, MAX450, and MVF) was dissolved in 1× PBS (Servicebio, Cat: G0002-15) and subsequently adsorbed onto 0.2% Alhydrogel (Brenntag Biosector, Denmark). Each mouse was subcutaneously immunized with 100 μL on days 4, 6, 8, and 10 after tumor establishment. Mice were administered 250 μg of Anti-CD20 (Abinvivo, Cat: B7431) on day 3 via intraperitoneal injection 30, followed by a tail intravenous injection of 1 mg·kg^-1^ of C5a receptor antagonists (C5aRA) on days 4 and 6 31. Additionally, intraperitoneal treatment with anti-Ly6G (200 μg; Leinco Technologies, Cat: L280) was administered starting on day 3 11, and another intraperitoneal injection of 20 mg·kg^-1^ of Bay11-7082 was given on day 4 32.
Antibody purification
Serum antibodies from immunized animals were isolated with a Protein A/G-based purification kit (biosharp, Cat: BL1264A). Refer to the manual for complete information.
Cell lines
The murine breast cancer cell line 4T1, melanoma cell line B16F10, and colon carcinoma cell line CT26 were obtained from Procell Life Science and Technology. 4T1 cells were routinely maintained in high-glucose Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM; Gibco, Life Technologies, USA), whereas CT26 and B16F10 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco, Life Technologies, USA). All media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 100 U/mL penicillin-streptomycin, and cells were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO₂.
Tumor implantation and assessment
BALB/c mice bearing CT26 (♂) or 4T1 (♀) tumors and C57BL/6 mice bearing B16F10 (♂) tumors were used to generate tumor models. Six- to eight-week-old mice received subcutaneous inoculation of 3 × 10⁵ tumor cells. Tumor growth was monitored by caliper measurement of length and width, and volumes were calculated as (length × width²)/2 33. Following sacrifice, tumors were excised and weighed. All animal housing and experimental procedures complied with institutional biosafety standards and were conducted with approval from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of Army Medical University (AMUWEC20230445).
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
The immunogenic response was determined by ELISA following standard laboratory procedures 29. Plates were coated overnight with 1 μM C5a peptide (SEQ ID NO:7) and subsequently blocked with 1% BSA in PBS for 1 h at 37 °C. Serum samples (1:2000 dilution) were incubated for 3 h at 37 °C, after which HRP-labeled secondary antibody (Beyotime Biotechnology, Cat: A0216) was applied for 40 min. Signal development was performed using TMB substrate for 10 min at 37 °C and stopped by addition of stop solution. Optical density was recorded at 450 nm, and antibody titers were calculated as the dilution yielding half-maximal absorbance (ODmax/2) 29.
Levels of IL-1β in PMN-MDSC culture supernatants were quantified using a high-sensitivity Mouse IL-1β ELISA kit (ABclonal, Cat: RK04878) following the manufacturer's guidelines.
Western blotting
Total cellular proteins were extracted by incubating cells on ice for 30 min in T-PER® lysis buffer (Thermo Scientific, XI355180) containing protease (1%; ABclonal, Cat: RM02916) and phosphatase inhibitors (1%; Servicebio, Cat: G2007-1ML). Protein concentrations were quantified using a NanoPhotometer® N50 (Implen), followed by denaturation in loading buffer (Beyotime Biotechnology, Cat: P0015L). Equivalent protein amounts were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes (immobilon®-p, Ref: IPVH00010). After blocking with Protein-Free Blocking Buffer for 1 h at room temperature, membranes were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C and then with HRP-linked secondary antibodies (Beyotime Biotechnology, Cat: A0208) for 1 h at room temperature. Chemiluminescent signals were visualized using a Chemiluminescence Imaging System (Servicebio, Cat: SCG-W2000) with WesternBright ECL HRP substrate (Advanta), and band intensities were quantified using ImageJ software. The following primary antibodies were used: Alpha Tubulin (proteintech, Cat:11224-1-AP), Phospho-NF-κB p65 (proteintech, Cat: 82335-1-RR), CCRL2 (Aifang biological, Cat: AF04218), IL-1β (ABclonal, Cat: A16288), NLRP3 (ABclonal, Cat: A5652), Caspase-1 (ABclonal, Cat: A0964).
Isolation of cells and flow cytometry
Single-cell suspensions were prepared from tumor tissues and selected organs of 4T1 tumor-bearing mice. For tumor analysis, excised tumors were finely minced and processed using a Mouse Tumor Dissociation Kit (Miltenyi, Cat: 130-096-730), followed by enzymatic digestion for approximately 42 min using a gentleMACS™ Octo Dissociator with Heaters (Miltenyi, Cat: 130-096-427). The resulting cell suspensions were filtered through 70 μm strainers (Beyotime Biotechnology, Cat: FSTR070) to remove debris and aggregates.
For bone marrow analysis, femurs were isolated, cleared of surrounding tissues, and flushed with sterile buffer using a 1 mL syringe, after which the cell suspension was passed through a 70 μm filter. Splenocyte suspensions were obtained by mechanically dissociating spleens through 70 μm cell strainers, followed by washing with FACS buffer (1× PBS containing 1% FBS).
Cells from all tissues were resuspended in FACS buffer, centrifuged at 300 g for 5 min at 4 °C, and subjected to red blood cell lysis using erythrocyte lysis buffer (Biosharp, Cat: BL503A) for 5 min at 4 °C. After washing, cells were incubated with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies at 4 °C for 30 min. Following additional washing steps, cells were resuspended in FACS buffer and analyzed using a BD FACSymphony™ A1 flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).
To evaluate the frequency and functional status of total MDSCs and their subsets (PMN-MDSCs and M-MDSCs), cells were stained with antibodies against Live/Dead dye (BioLegend, Cat: 423105), CD45 (Cat: 103132), CD11b (Cat: 101263), Gr-1 (Cat: 108406), Ly6C (Cat: 128037), Ly6G (Cat: 127639), CCRL2 (Cat: 114007), and intracellular IL-1β (eBioscience™, Cat: 11-7114-82).
For CD8⁺ T-cell analysis, cells were surface-stained with antibodies against CD45 (Cat: 103132), CD3 (Cat: 100306), CD8 (Cat: 100752), and PD-1 (Cat: 135205), followed by intracellular staining for IFN-γ (BioLegend, Cat: 505826).
Isolation of immune cells from tumor and cell sorting
Thirteen days after 4T1 tumor implantation, mice were euthanized and tumors were minced into small fragments, which were treated with a tumor Dissociation Kit for 42 min at atgentleMACS™ Octo Dissociator with Heaters. Single-cell suspensions were then labeled with Live/Die and CD45 (Biolegend, Cat: 147711) and subsequently sorted using a FACS Aria III cell sorter (BD Biosciences).
Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis
Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) data processing and analysis were conducted by NovelBio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd. with NovelBrain Cloud Analysis Platform. Raw sequencing data in FASTQ format were initially processed to remove adaptor sequences and low-quality reads using default filtering parameters, yielding high-quality clean data. UMI-tools were employed to identify valid cell barcodes and generate a barcode whitelist for downstream single-cell transcriptome analysis. Clean UMI-based reads were aligned to the mouse reference genome (Ensembl version 100) using STARmapping with customized parameters derived from the standard UMI-tools pipeline, allowing generation of UMI count matrices for each sample. Cells containing more than 200 expressied genes and exhibiting a mitochondrial UMI proportion below 20% were retained for further analysis, and mitochondrial genes were excluded from the final expression matrix. Following removal of low-quality cells and contaminating non-immune lineages, a total of 7,949 immune cells were included in the analysis (Ctrl group: 4,304 cells; MAX449 group: 3,645 cells). Data normalization, scaling, and regression were performed using the Seurat package (version 3.1.4; https://satijalab.org/seurat/), accounting for UMI counts and mitochondrial gene content. Principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted based on the top 2,000 highly variable genes, and the first 10 principal components were subsequently used for Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) visualization.
Unsupervised clustering was performed using a graph-based approach with a resolution parameter set to 0.8, based on the first 10 principal components derived from PCA. Marker genes for each cluster were identified using the FindAllMarkers function with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, applying the following thresholds: lnFC > 0.25, P value < 0.05, and minimum expression in more than 10% of cells (min.pct > 0.1). For refined cell-type annotation, clusters corresponding to the same cell lineage were further subsetted and subjected to secondary UMAP visualization, graph-based reclustering, and marker gene analysis. Differentially expressed genes were identified using DESeq2 with cutoffs of |log₂ fold change| > 0.25 and P < 0.05, and the resulting gene expression patterns were visualized using heatmaps. Functional enrichment analyses were conducted to identify significantly altered biological pathways based on the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Gene Ontology (GO) databases. Fisher's exact test was applied to assess pathway enrichment, and statistical significance was determined according to both P values and false discovery rate (FDR) thresholds.
Differential gene expression analysis was conducted for all cell populations within the filtered and integrated datasets using the FindMarkers function (Wilcoxon rank-sum test) implemented in the Seurat package. For each experimental group, cell type-specific gene expression matrices were generated, and the top 20 genes with P values < 0.01 were selected as representative markers for each cell population. Heatmaps were constructed using the ComplexHeatmap package, with the selected marker genes annotated alongside the plots. To explore the biological functions associated with individual cell clusters, Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was performed on cluster-specific genes using the clusterProfiler package. The top 15 significantly enriched pathways (P < 0.05) were selected and visualized as bar plots using the ggplot2 package.
Single-cell trajectory inference was performed using Monocle2 (http://cole-trapnell-lab.github.io/monocle-release) with the DDRTree algorithm and default parameters. Prior to trajectory construction, marker genes identified from Seurat-based clustering and raw expression count matrices from quality-filtered cells were selected as input for Monocle analysis. Pseudotime ordering was subsequently applied to reconstruct cell state transitions, and branch expression analysis modeling (BEAM) was used to identify genes associated with lineage bifurcation and cell fate decisions. For annotation of Monocle-defined states, we curated and integrated previously reported marker gene sets characteristic of MDSCs and neutrophil populations, including neutrophil progenitors, mature neutrophils, transitional PMN-MDSCs, and terminal PMN-MDSCs, as described in published studies 34. Cell functional scores derived from predefined gene sets were calculated using the AddModuleScore function.
Isolation of PMN-MDSCs
Isolation of PMN-MDSCs was carried out based on the method established by Chaoxiong Wang et al 35. Bone marrow-derived single-cell suspensions were first subjected to red blood cell lysis, followed by enrichment of PMN-MDSCs using a commercial Mouse Bone Marrow Neutrophil Isolation Solution Kit (Solarbio, Cat: P8550) according to the supplier's protocol.
Transwell migration assays
Cell migration was assessed using Transwell insert chambers with 8-μm pore membranes (Corning). PMN-MDSCs were isolated from mice within the same experimental group and pooled at equal numbers. Cells were preincubated with or without C5aRA/MAX449-induced antibodies for 1 h, after which 6 × 10⁵ PMN-MDSCs were plated into the upper chamber in 100 μL of medium containing 0.5% FBS. The lower chambers were filled with medium supplemented with 10% FBS as the control condition, or with C5a-treated conditioned medium containing 10% FBS for experimental conditions. After 6 h of incubation, cells that had migrated through the membrane were collected, and 10 μL of the cell suspension was counted under a microscope.
RNA extraction and qRT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated from cells using the RNeasy™ Animal RNA Isolation Kit with Spin Columns (Beyotime Biotechnology, Cat: R0026) and subsequently reverse transcribed into cDNA with the ABScript Neo RT Master Mix for qPCR with gDNA removal (ABclonal, Cat: RK20433). Quantitative real-time PCR was carried out using 2× Universal SYBR Green Fast qPCR Mix (ABclonal, Cat: RK21203) on a Roche LightCycler® 480 system. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate with a final reaction volume of 10 μL. TBP served as the internal control, and relative gene expression levels were calculated using the 2^-ΔΔCt method.
Primer sequences are listed:
CCRL2 Forward (5'→3'): TGTGTTTCCTGCTTCCCCTG,
CCRL2 Reverse (5'→3'): CGAGGAGTGGAGTCCGACAA;
TBP Forward (5'→3'): CCCCACAACTCTTCCATTCT,
TBP Reverse (5'→3'): TACTGGGGATAGTGAGGACG.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software (version 8.4.0). Comparisons between two groups were conducted using a two-tailed unpaired Student's t-test with a 95% confidence interval, while multiple-group comparisons were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Tumor growth differences were specifically evaluated using one-way ANOVA. Statistical significance was defined as follows: ****P < 0.0001, ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05, and ns indicating no significance (P > 0.05). Data are presented as Mean ± s.e.m, unless otherwise stated.
Results
Newly modified C5a vaccines were developed and exhibited remarkably high immunogenicity
Previous studies have shown that blocking C5a-C5aR pathway could inhibit tumor growth in various mouse models 13,19,36. Current drug development targeting this pathway primarily focuses on monoclonal antibody therapies such as GOHIBIC™ (Vilobelimab), avdoralimab (IPH 5401), and 607 TJ210 (MOR210). However, these therapies face significant limitations, including low response rates, toxicity, development of resistance, and high costs 28. Therefore, novel immune therapies targeting C5a-C5aR pathway are urgently needed to enhance treatment efficacy and duration of response.
The B cell peptide vaccine presents multiple advantages, including sustained anti-tumor effects, rapid and scalable synthesis, favorable safety profiles with minimal toxicity, and low production costs, making it a promising strategy in cancer therapy area 28,37. However, there have been no reports of B cell peptide vaccines specifically targeting the C5a-C5aR pathway for tumor therapy. Consequently, we hypothesize that constructing C5a B cell epitope peptide vaccines could exert excellent anti-tumor effects. In previous research, Christine Landlinger developed a series of C5a-peptide vaccines that successfully generated strong and specific immunogenic responses targeting the pro-inflammatory factor C5a. These C5a B cell epitope peptide vaccines significantly mitigated neuronal impairment and improved disease-related symptoms in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model 29,38. For the anti-tumor effect assessment, a C5a peptide vaccine composed of the 68-74 amino acid region of C5a (SEQ ID NO:7, CN103269711A) conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) was selected for anti-tumor effect test based on its capability to induce high-titer anti-C5a polyclonal antibodies in the Alzheimer's disease mouse model (Figure 1A,) 29,38. Considering the critical importance of suppressing the C5a-C5aR signaling axis in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease therapy, we propose that this vaccine peptide may serve as a potential treatment for tumors. However, its anti-tumor effects were evaluated in breast cancer transplantation models, and the results indicated that it was ineffective (Figure 1B-E).
We hypothesized that the C5a peptide (SEQ ID NO:7, CN103269711A) exhibited low immunogenicity and couldn't effectively induce enough C5a antibody for eliminating tumors. Therefore, our objective was to modify the existing peptide to generate one with enhanced immunogenicity and potential anti-tumor properties by incorporating helper T cell (Th) epitope sequences to augment the immunogenicity of cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) epitopes. Two Th epitope sequences were chosen and synthesized: the measles virus-derived fusion peptide (MVF; amino acids 288-302, KLLSLIKGVIVHRLEGVE) and a tetanus toxoid-derived peptide (TT3; residues 947-967, FNNFTVSFWLRVPKVSASHL) 28. Ultimately, two previously unreported C5a B cell epitope peptides were generated, named as MAX449 and MAX450 (Figure 1F). To further evaluate the immunogenicity of these two vaccines, we measured antibody levels induced by the vaccines in mouse models. The results revealed that C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice immunized with MAX449 and MAX450 exhibited significantly higher antibody levels than those receiving the pre-modified C5a vaccine (SEQ ID NO:7, CN103269711A) (Figure 1G), indicating that the MAX449 and MAX450 peptides possess enhanced immunogenicity and may exhibit superior anti-tumor effects.
MAX449 demonstrated impressive anti-tumor effects in various mouse models by blocking the C5a-C5aR pathway through B cell-derived C5a antibody
To assess the therapeutic potential of the two newly modified C5a vaccines, we established a 4T1 xenograft mouse model, which was recognized as a typical cold tumor.
The tumor-bearing mice received treatment with C5a vaccines at early stages (Days 4, 6, 8, and 10) following tumor inoculation (Figure 1H). Among the groups, MAX449 exhibited the most significant anti-tumor activity, effectively restraining tumor growth in the mouse models. Conversely, the treatment with MAX450 resulted in a comparatively weaker therapeutic effect (Figure 1I-K). To further confirm the antitumor activity of the vaccine peptides, their therapeutic effects were assessed in another cold tumor model, the CT26 transplant tumor mouse model. As shown in Figure 1L-O, MAX449 demonstrated markedly superior anti-tumor activity in the CT26 xenograft model, whereas MAX450 exhibited a comparatively weaker therapeutic effect. These findings suggested that MAX449 consistently exhibited strong anti-tumor effects in cold tumor models. Additionally, we explored the anti-tumor efficacy of the vaccine peptides in the “B16F10 transplanted mouse tumor,” a hot tumor model, where MAX449 also displayed the best anti-tumor effect (Figure 1P-S). Collectively, these results confirm that MAX449 treatment significantly inhibits tumor growth across various mouse models.
MAX449 was designed by incorporating helper T cell (Th) epitope sequences MVF into the 68-74 amino acid region of C5a to enhance its immunogenicity. Exclude the possibility that the antitumor activity observed with MAX449 arises from the MVF peptide component, we immunized tumor-bearing mice with the MVF peptide alone (Figure 2A). The results presented in Figure 2B-D demonstrated that the MVF peptide alone had no anti-tumor effect. Subsequently, to determine whether the anti-tumor effect elicited by MAX449 relies on B cells, we administered an anti-CD20 antibody to deplete B cells in a mouse tumor transplant model. As depicted in Figure 2E-I, this B cell depletion abolished the anti-tumor effect of MAX449, indicating that its efficacy is B cell-dependent. Furthermore, to confirm that MAX449 exerts anti-tumor effects by inducing the production of C5a antibodies, which block the C5a-C5aR pathway, we treated tumor-bearing mice with C5aR receptor antagonist (C5aRA). Figure 2J-M demonstrated that tumor growth was significantly inhibited in both the C5aRA treatment group and the MAX449 group. However, tumor size did not differ significantly between mice treated with C5aRA alone and those receiving the combined C5aRA and MAX449 treatment, indicating that MAX449 mediated its anti-tumor effect by blocking the C5a-C5aR pathway.
MAX449 modulated the tumor immune milieu
The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a critical role in contributing to poor prognosis in cancer treatment, and its modulation offers a strategy to restore anti-tumor immunity. Previous research has shown that targeting the C5a-C5aR pathway can remodel the TME by influencing key immune cells such as MDSCs, macrophages and neutrophils 39. To further investigate the anti-tumor mechanism of MAX449, we analyzed tumor-infiltrated CD45^+^ immune cells using the NovelCyto/BD platform. Following rigorous quality control, transcriptional profiling was performed on 7,949 cells (Ctrl: 4,304 cells, MAX449: 3,645 cells), with cell populations resolved using nonlinear dimensional reduction and UMAP clustering, the CD45^+^ immune cells were classified into 13 distinct populations (Figure 3A). Relative to the control group, we detected a marked decrease in PMN-MDSCs and neutrophils, accompanied by an increased abundance of CD8^+^ T cells, CD4^+^ T cells and DC cells (Figure 3B). To explore the effects of MAX449 on immune regulation, we found that its administration significantly influenced the functional profiles of PMN-MDSCs, M-MDSCs and neutrophils (Figure 3C). Flow cytometric analysis further confirmed a pronounced increase in infiltrating M1 macrophages, CD8^+^ T cells and B cells and a decrease in PMN-MDSCs, Monocytes, M2 macrophages and neutrophils infiltration in tumors with MAX449 treatment (Figure 3D-N).
MAX449 treatment shaped the transcriptional landscape of PMN-MDSC
As the results above demonstrated, in contrast to controls, MAX449 administration resulted in the most significant modulation of PMN-MDSC and neutrophil populations at both quantitative and transcriptional levels. Neutrophils and PMN-MDSCs, both belonging to the granulocyte family, share a common origin, follow similar differentiation pathways, and have related phenotypes 34. To evaluate the effects of MAX449 treatment on granulocytes, we performed clustering analyses to delineate distinct granulocyte subpopulations (Figure 4A).
Analysis of the granulocyte differentiation trajectory indicated that PMN-MDSCs primarily exert immunosuppressive effects within the tumor microenvironment, whereas mature neutrophils mainly perform anti-tumor functions. We speculate that MAX449 may exert its antitumor activity mainly through decreasing PMN-MDSCs abundance and inhibiting their immunosuppressive function. Furthermore, flow cytometry results indicated that following MAX449 treatment, the quantity of PMN-MDSCs significantly decreased not only in the tumor microenvironment (Figure 3D) but also in the bone marrow and spleen (Figure 4C-D), indicating that MAX449 may mediate its anti-tumor activity by suppressing PMN-MDSCs. To further confirm whether MAX449 mainly exerts anti-tumor effects by targeting PMN-MDSCs, we depleted MDSCs in mice using Anti-Ly6G and subsequently treated tumor-bearing mice with MAX449 (Figure 4E). As shown in Figures 4F-I, the anti-tumor effect of MAX449 diminished after MDSC depletion, indicating that MAX449 primarily exerts its anti-tumor effect by inhibiting PMN-MDSCs. To explore the mechanisms by which MAX449 regulates PMN-MDSC function, pathway analysis utilizing Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment identified several enriched pathways in PMN-MDSCs, including the TNF signaling pathway, IL-17 signaling pathway, and NF-κB signaling pathway (Figure 4J). Additionally, Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis indicated that MAX449 treatment significantly decreased inflammatory response and chemotaxis-related activities in PMN-MDSCs (Figure 4K). Notably, differential gene expression analysis revealed downregulation of inflammation-related gene signatures (Ccl3, Il1b, and Cxcl2) in PMN-MDSCs, alongside a reduction in the expression of the migration-associated gene Ccrl2 (Figure 4L-N). Flow cytometry experiments further confirmed a reduction in CCRL2 and IL-1β expression in PMN-MDSC cells within the tumor microenvironment of MAX449-treated mice (Figure 4O-P). Based on these findings, we proposed that MAX449 affect the recruitment of PMN-MDSCs and their immunosuppressive functions, thereby modulating the tumor immune milieu.
MAX449 suppresses PMN-MDSC migration and immunosuppressive activity by downregulating CCRL2 and IL-1β via inhibition of the NF-κB signaling pathway
Given the critical role of CCRL2 in directing cell migration to inflammatory sites 40. Its upregulation is essential for CXCR2-dependent recruitment of granulocytes 41. We hypothesized that MAX449 downregulated CCRL2 expression in PMN-MDSCs, thereby reducing their migration toward the tumor microenvironment. Transwell assays demonstrated that PMN-MDSCs migration increased following C5a stimulation, while blocking the C5a-C5aR pathway with C5aRA resulted in decreased migration. MAX449 treatment exhibited effects akin to those of C5aRA (Figure 5A-B). These findings suggested that MAX449 attenuated the recruitment of PMN-MDSCs to the tumor microenvironment through suppression of CCRL2 expression. Prior studies have demonstrated that NF-κB can directly associate with the CCRL2 promoter to activate its transcriptionn 42. KEGG analysis demonstrated that genes associated with the NF-κB signaling pathway is enriched in PMN-MDSCs (Figure 4J). Therefore, we hypothesized that MAX449 downregulated CCRL2 expression in PMN-MDSCs by modulating of the NF-κB pathway. Western blot analysis revealed a significant increase in CCRL2 expression on PMN-MDSCs after C5a stimulation. However, this increase could be reversed by C5aRA, MAX449 induced antibodies, and the NF-κB inhibitor BAY11-7082 (Figure 5C). These findings were corroborated by qRT-PCR analysis (Figure 5D). Overall, our findings suggested that MAX449 decreased PMN-MDSCs migration by downregulating CCRL2 expression through inhibition of the NF-κB signaling pathway. In addition, IL-1β is a key regulator of the immunosuppressive activity of these cells 43-45. We hypothesized that MAX449 diminishes the immunosuppressive capacity of PMN-MDSCs by lowering IL-1β levels. Previous studies have demonstrated that NF-κB/NLRP3/caspase-1 regulated the expression of IL-1β 46. Thus, we posited that MAX449 reduced the immunosuppressive function of PMN-MDSCs by decreasing IL-1β secretion via the NF-κB pathway. To test this hypothesis, we assessed the phosphorylation of NF-κB components, NLRP3, Caspase-1, and IL-1β in PMN-MDSCs treated with or without C5a, C5aRA, and MAX449 induced antibodies. The data indicated that levels of p-NF-κB, NLRP3, Caspase-1, and IL-1β increased after C5a stimulation, while they decreased following treatment with MAX449 antibodies, C5aRA, and BAY11-7082 (NF-κB pathway inhibitor) (Figure 5E). These findings were further corroborated by ELISA assays (Figure 5F). In conclusion, the results suggested that MAX449 inhibited the migration and immunosuppressive function of PMN-MDSCs by downregulating CCRL2 and IL-1β expression via the NF-κB signaling pathway.
To determine whether suppression of the NF-κB/CCRL2 and NF-κB/IL-1β axes by MAX449 contributes to its antitumor activity, 4T-1 xenograft mice were administered with MAX449 in combination with Bay11-7082 (Figure 5G). Treatment with MAX449 resulted in a significant reduction in tumor burden (Figure 5H-J). Additionally, flow cytometry results indicated a reduction in CCRL2 and IL-1β expression in PMN-MDSC (Figure 5K-L). However, Bay11-7082 reversed the antitumor activity of MAX449, supporting a critical role for NF-κB signaling suppression in MAX449-mediated tumor control (Figure 5H-L).
MAX449 significantly enhances the therapeutic outcomes of PD-1 inhibition in various mouse tumor models
The results demonstrated that MAX449 effectively inhibits tumor progression by decreasing the infiltration of PMN-MDSCs. Previous studies have shown that targeting MDSCs in the tumor microenvironment facilitates T-cell activation and improves responses to immunotherapy in mouse models with either sensitivity or resistance to PD-1 blockade 35,47. Consequently, we speculated that MAX449 administration might enhance the effectiveness of PD-1 targeted immunotherapy in cold tumors with intrinsically low responsiveness to PD-1 blockade.
To examine this possibility, we first applied the combination strategy on the cold breast cancer model. In the subcutaneous 4T1 tumor model, we observed that co-treatment with MAX449 and the anti-PD-1 antibody RMP1-14 significantly restrained tumor growth relative to single-agent treatment (Figure 6A-D). A critical mechanism underlying the synergy in immunotherapy is the elimination of PMN-MDSCs alongside the reactivation of CD8^+^ T cells. To characterize MAX449 and/or PD-1 blockade mediated remodeling of the tumor microenvironment, MDSCs and CD8^+^ T cells populations were analyzed in mice bearing 4T1 tumors. Mice were terminated on day 19, prior to full tumor elimination by the combined therapy. Notably, treatment with MAX449 plus PD-1 blockade resulted in a significant reduction in intratumoral PMN-MDSC frequencies relative to control and monotherapy groups. Furthermore, a significant elevation in the proportion of CD8⁺ T cells was observed following the combination treatment. Consistently, among all groups, the MAX449/Anti-PD1 group exhibited the lowest PD-1 expression on CD8⁺ T cells, whereas the highest proportion of IFN-γ-producing CD8⁺ T cells was observed in this group (Figure 6E), indicating an enhanced immunotherapeutic effect. Next, we used a CD20 antibody to deplete B cells before combining MAX449 and PD-1 antibodies, to observe whether the combined anti-tumor effect was diminished. As demonstrated in Figure 6F-M, the combination administration of MAX449 and PD-1 blockade exhibited robust antitumor effects; however, this effect was attenuated by CD20 antibody, further confirming that MAX449 enhances the anti-tumor efficacy of PD-1 antibody through inducing C5a antibodies production.
We also assessed the combination effect in spontaneous adenoma breast tumor models (MMTV-PyMT mouse model) (Figure 6N-O), CT26 (Figure 6P-S), and B16-F10 (Figure 6T-W) xenograft mouse models. Administration of anti-PD-1 treatment on Day 125, when spontaneous tumors were observed, alongside MAX449 (on Days 115, 122, and 125), resulted in a marked suppression of tumor growth by Day 130 (Figure 6N-O). The combination treatment also exhibited superior therapeutic effects compared to PD-1 blockade alone, as evidenced by decreased tumor burden in the CT26 and B16-F10 xenograft mouse models (Figure 6P-W), suggesting a promising potential for combining MAX449 and anti-PD-1 in cancer immunotherapy. In conclusion, MAX449 markedly improves the therapeutic effectiveness of PD-1 antibodies in both cold and hot tumors, offering new strategies to address the lack of response to PD-1 antibodies in cold tumors treatment.
Discussion
Data from experimental models and clinical studies suggest that the C5a-C5aR pathway is essential for tumor immune evasion and subsequent tumor progression 21. Among various potential mechanisms, inhibition of the C5a-C5aR1 axis may partially alleviate the MDSC-mediated immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment 11,12,39. Given the current landscape in this field, the development of effective, specific, and safe therapeutics targeting the C5a-C5aR pathway is essential. Engineered peptide vaccines capable of inducing sustained polyclonal antibody responses with strong antitumor activity, while inhibiting the C5a-C5aR pathway, constitute a promising therapeutic strategy that offers clear advantages compared with current treatments 24,25.
Here, we advance our checkpoint inhibition strategy by introducing a vaccine targeting C5a. We developed two C5a-based peptide vaccines, MAX449 and MAX450, and proved eliciting strong immunogenic responses. We evaluated the efficacy of the C5a peptide vaccine in vivo using syngeneic mammary tumor models, namely, BALB/c mice bearing 4T1 or CT26 tumors and C57BL/6 mice bearing B16F10 tumors. The MAX449 group exhibited significantly enhanced tumor inhibition. MAX449 inhibited tumor progression by reducing the abundance of PMN-MDSCs while enhancing CD8⁺ T cell infiltration within the tumor microenvironment.
Current research is increasingly focused on identifying synergistic regimens that integrate checkpoint blockade with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, or additional immunotherapy strategies 8. Although many combination regimens emphasize PD-1/PD-L1 blockade, the immunosuppressive nature of the tumor microenvironment continues to limit therapeutic efficacy 13. Here, we establish a translational framework for clinically evaluating a new combinatorial approach integrating anti-PD-1 antibodies and MAX449, which inhibits C5a-C5aR pathways. Our results demonstrate that MAX449 enhances anti-PD-1 efficacy in both spontaneous adenoma and orthotopic breast cancer models. This approach is based on the premise that targeting immunosuppressive cells in the tumor microenvironment could optimize the activation and expansion of effector T cells. A plausible explanation for the synergistic interaction between MAX449 and anti-PD-1 therapy is that C5a-C5aR signaling drives immunosuppressive mechanisms that limit the anti-tumor efficacy of PD-1 blockade. Supporting the hypothesis, our results indicated that the combination treatment decreased PMN-MDSCs abundance while increasing CD8^+^ T cells frequency, along with reducing PD-1 expression, collectively indicating a more complete restoration of CD8^+^ T-cell effector functions.
In-depth mechanistic studies are essential for accurately assessing the roles of MAX449. SCRNA-seq and flow cytometry analyses indicate that MAX449 reduced the abundance of PMN-MDSCs within the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Additional investigation revealed that MAX449 suppressed PMN-MDSCs migration and immunosuppressive activity by downregulating CCRL2 expression and IL-1β secretion via activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway within the tumor microenvironment. Building on these results, the B cell peptide vaccine MAX449 we developed has the potential to eliminate tumor cells by diminishing PMN-MDSCs migration to the tumor microenvironment and inhibiting their immunosuppressive function, thereby exhibiting anti-tumor activity. This vaccine may offer new insights for the field of cancer therapy.
A central concern when deliberately neutralising an innate-immune mediator such as C5a is the potential for prolonged immunosuppression and increased susceptibility to infection. In this research, we have therefore generated experimental evidence that the anti-C5a vaccine MAX449 can be administered safely in the context of cancer therapy. First, the temporal circulating C5a was characterized in tumour-bearing mice (Supplementary Figure S1A). ELISA analysis revealed that while MAX449 immunization significantly reduced circulating C5a levels compared to controls, the nadir occurred around Day 24 post-initial immunization. Crucially, C5a levels began to recover thereafter, demonstrating that the vaccine-induced suppression is not indefinite and is subject to physiological regulation. The reversibility of the MAX449-induced effect therefore mitigates the risk of sustained complement deficiency while preserving the anti-tumour benefit during the period of active immunisation. Second, we evaluated whether the transient C5a deficiency compromises acute antibacterial defence. On day 24-when C5a concentrations were at their lowest-immunized and control group was challenged intranasally treated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Survival curves (Supplementary Figure S1B) proved no statistically significant difference between two groups. These findings indicate that the degree and duration of C5a neutralisation achieved with MAX449 are insufficient to impair the rapid innate immune response required for clearance of a common opportunistic pathogen. Importantly, the infection model employed a Gram-negative organism that is highly dependent on C5a-mediated neutrophil recruitment, thus providing a stringent test of safety 48. In summary, the results substantiate that MAX449 can generate potent anti-tumour immunity while retaining a favourable safety profile.
Besides, the vaccine's safety and specificity as a B-cell epitope hinge on its ability to elicit humoral immunity without inadvertently priming cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) responses against self-antigens. Our vaccine design purposefully adheres to this principle. Firstly, rational vaccine design focused on B-Cell epitopes: MAX449 incorporates a defined linear B-cell epitope derived from the C5a sequence (amino acids 68-74, KDMQLGR). This epitope was selected on the basis of its location within the native folded C5a protein and its predicted surface accessibility for antibody binding-features that are hallmarks of effective B-cell epitopes 29. This design philosophy has been successfully applied to B-cell vaccines targeting HER-2 and PD-1/PD-L1, where the aim is to mimic conformational or linear structures recognized by B-cell receptors (BCRs) and thereby drive B-cell activation and antibody production 28,49. The core strategy deliberately avoids incorporation of known cytotoxic T-cell (CTL) epitopes. To boost B-cell epitope immunogenicity and promote robust, T-cell-mediated antibody class switching and affinity maturation, we fused the C5a B-cell epitope to a well-characterized, a measles virus fusion protein-derived promiscuous Th epitope (MVF, aa 288-302) and connected by a flexible GPSL linker. This approach is a cornerstone of modern B-cell epitope vaccine design and provides CD4⁺ Th cell help without delivering MHC-class I-restricted CTL epitopes 28. Besides, we also performed an in vitro T-cell activation experiment to verify the absence of C5a-specific CTL activation. Splenocytes obtained from naïve mice were cultured in the presence of MAX449 peptide or left untreated as a control. After 24 h, intracellular interferon-γ production-a hallmark of activated CD8⁺ CTLs-was quantified by flow cytometry 50,51. Results in Supplementary Figure S2 revealed no significant variation in CD8⁺ IFN-γ⁺ T cells percentages between the two groups. These data demonstrate that exposure to MAX449 does not induce CTL activation or IFN-γ secretion under conditions designed to detect such responses. The result is fully consistent with the vaccine's intended B-cell-centric mechanism and the Th-only nature of the MVF epitope.
In the research, we were surprised to find that the anti-CD20 antibody, which alone induces tumor regression, loses its effect when combined with the C5a-targeted vaccine MAX449 (Figure 2F). MAX449 contains the MVF peptide, a promiscuous T cell helper epitope known to expand CD4⁺ T follicular helper (Tfh) cells. Previous research proved that Tfh cells could promote tumor progression by providing help to B cell subsets and shaping an immunosuppressive microenvironment 52,53. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that the proportion of CD4⁺ CXCR5⁺ PD1⁺ Tfh cells was significantly elevated in the MAX449 + anti CD20 group compared with either monotherapy (Supplementary Figure S3). Thus, the antagonism appears to arise from MAX449 driven Tfh expansion, which interferes with anti CD20-mediated anti-tumor effect. The precise mechanisms by which Tfh cells interfere with anti-CD20-mediated B-cell depletion will be explored in future studies.
Conclusion
In summary, we have developed MAX449, a B cell peptide tumor vaccine targeting the C5a-C5aR pathway, which exhibited remarkable anti-tumor effects. This vaccine not only inhibited the migration of PMN-MDSCs to the tumor microenvironment through downregulating CCRL2 expression by the NF-κB signaling pathway but also reduced their immunosuppressive function by decreasing IL-1β production via the same mechanism. Notably, the administration of the vaccine significantly elevates the proportion of CD8^+^ T cells and their antitumor effect. Importantly, it has been demonstrated to strengthen the therapeutic efficacy of PD-1 blockades in mouse models of cold tumors. Overall, MAX449 activates immune system, showcasing the potential of B cell epitope peptide vaccines in anti-tumor therapy. A schematic overview of the entire study workflow is presented in Figure 7.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary figures.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Siegel RL Miller KD Wagle NS Jemal A Cancer statistics, 2023 CA Cancer J Clin 202373117483663352510.3322/caac.21763 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Anand U Dey A Chandel AKS Sanyal R Mishra A Pandey DK Cancer chemotherapy and beyond: Current status, drug candidates, associated risks and progress in targeted therapeutics Genes Dis 202310413674013739755710.1016/j.gendis.2022.02.007PMC 10310991 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Chandra RA Keane FK Voncken FEM Thomas CR Contemporary radiotherapy: present and future Lancet 202139810295171843416660710.1016/S 0140-6736(21)00233-6 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4He X Xu C Immune checkpoint signaling and cancer immunotherapy Cell Res 202030866093246759210.1038/s 41422-020-0343-4PMC 7395714 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Hegde PS Chen DS Top 10 Challenges in Cancer Immunotherapy Immunity 202052117353194026810.1016/j.immuni.2019.12.011 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Ribas A Wolchok JD Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade Science 20183596382135052956770510.1126/science.aar 4060 PMC 7391259 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Twomey JD Zhang B Cancer Immunotherapy Update: FDA-Approved Checkpoint Inhibitors and Companion Diagnostics AAPS J 2021232393367768110.1208/s 12248-021-00574-0PMC 7937597 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Melero I Berman DM Aznar MA Korman AJPérez Gracia JL Haanen J Evolving synergistic combinations of targeted immunotherapies to combat cancer Nat Rev Cancer 2015158457722620534010.1038/nrc 3973 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
