# Qualitative Study on Vaccinations for Travelers

**Authors:** Fabiana Nuccetelli, Sara Ciampini, Valeria Gabellone, Patrizio Zanobini, Pierluigi Lopalco, Luigi Roberto Biasio

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/vaccines14010047 · Vaccines · 2025-12-30

## TL;DR

This study explores how travelers in central Italy perceive and respond to vaccination recommendations, highlighting the role of communication, beliefs, and cultural factors in vaccine hesitancy.

## Contribution

The study applies the '3Cs' Vaccine Hesitancy model to analyze travelers' attitudes in a focus group setting, revealing new insights into the barriers to vaccination adherence.

## Key findings

- Four thematic areas influencing vaccination decisions were identified: socio-cultural/environmental factors, psychological/emotional influences, knowledge/information access, and general health perceptions.
- Communication gaps and misinformation significantly reduced trust in vaccine efficacy and necessity.
- Cultural background and personal risk perception strongly influenced vaccination behavior among travelers.

## Abstract

Background: Vaccinations are essential to protect travelers from infectious diseases, especially in high-risk destinations. However, awareness and adherence to vaccination recommendations vary, influenced by communication, personal beliefs, and behavior. Methods: A focus group was conducted in February 2025 at a local health authority in central Italy, specifically within its travel clinic, to explore travelers’ awareness, attitudes, and behaviors regarding vaccination. The discussion was analyzed using the “3Cs” Vaccine Hesitancy model. Participants were purposively selected to ensure diversity and representativeness. Discussions included past travel experiences, knowledge of required vaccines, motivations for immunization, and barriers to access. Results: Four key thematic areas emerged: socio-cultural/environmental factors, psychological/emotional influences, knowledge/information access, and general health perceptions. Communication gaps often weakened belief in vaccine efficacy and necessity. Cultural background, past experiences, and risk perception heavily influenced decisions. Discussion: Although vaccination is widely viewed as a protective measure, vaccine hesitancy persists due to misinformation and limited institutional trust. The COVID-19 pandemic intensified both awareness and skepticism. The 3Cs model clarified hesitancy levels and barriers, emphasizing the need for effective communication and trust-building. Conclusions: Enhancing access to accurate information, strengthening healthcare professionals’ communicative role, and reducing economic obstacles are crucial. Tailored awareness campaigns and integrated health policies are essential to increasing vaccine uptake, safeguarding traveler health, and limiting global disease spread. Patient or Public Contribution: Members of the public contributed to this study by participating in a focus group, where they shared their personal experiences, perceptions, and opinions regarding travel-related vaccinations. Their insights provided valuable qualitative data that helped inform the study’s findings. However, they were not involved in the study design, the analysis of the data, or the preparation of the manuscript. The role of participants was limited to the data collection phase of the study.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** infectious diseases (MESH:D003141), COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12846634/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12846634/full.md

## References

35 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12846634/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12846634