# The Role of Immunogenetics in the Host–Parasite Interaction of Chagas Disease: Implications for Personalized Medicine

## TL;DR

This paper reviews how host immunogenetics and parasite diversity influence Chagas disease outcomes and highlights the potential for personalized medicine approaches.

## Contribution

The paper emphasizes the role of immunogenetic markers in predicting disease progression and tailoring therapies for Chagas disease.

## Key findings

- Host genetic factors like HLA genes and cytokine polymorphisms influence disease susceptibility and progression.
- Parasite lineage diversity affects immune evasion and therapeutic responses.
- Immunogenetic markers could guide personalized treatment strategies but require further validation.

## Abstract

Chagas disease, caused by the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, continues to be a significant global health issue, especially in Latin America, with increasing international prevalence due to migration. Despite advancements in diagnosis and treatment, it remains a neglected tropical disease characterized by significant morbidity and mortality, mainly influenced by the complex interaction between parasite diversity and host immune responses. Importantly, the remarkable genetic diversity of T. cruzi lineages also contributes to clinical heterogeneity, influencing immune evasion, therapeutic responses, and vaccine feasibility. This review analyzes the impact of immunogenetics on host–parasite interactions in Chagas disease and explores its implications for personalized therapy approaches. Recent research, particularly over the last decade, has indicated that processes including antigenic variation, extracellular vesicle-mediated regulation, and disruption of host signaling pathways facilitate parasite persistence. Host genetic variables significantly influence susceptibility, disease development, and treatment outcomes, including changes in Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) genes, cytokine gene polymorphisms, and immunogenetic determinants of cardiac pathology. These findings underscore the potential of immunogenetic markers as tools for prognosis and as targets for personalized therapies. However, there are still considerable research deficiencies. Inadequate comprehension of gene–environment interactions, lack of representation of varied populations, and inconsistencies in study design limit the use of immunogenetic findings in therapeutic settings. At present, the concept of personalized medicine in Chagas disease remains largely aspirational, better understood as a framework for precision public health or stratified interventions guided by host immunogenetic and parasite lineage data. Addressing these issues necessitates comprehensive genomic research, mechanistic investigations of host–parasite interactions, and clinical validation of genetic markers. This study emphasizes the necessity of incorporating immunogenetics into personalized patient management strategies based on existing evidence. This integration has the potential to improve diagnosis, enhance treatment efficacy, and inform preventive interventions, thereby advancing personalized therapy for Chagas disease.