Correction: Tanaka et al. Relationship Between Socioeconomic Status and Organized Sports Among Primary School Children: A Gender-Based Analysis of Sports Participation. Sports 2025, 13, 165
Chiaki Tanaka, Eun-Young Lee, Shigeho Tanaka

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsYouth Development and Social Support · Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports · Physical Education and Pedagogy
1. Error in Table
In the original publication [1], there were values that were mistyped in Table 3 as published. For “Gymnastics”, the 95% CI for the variable of the “Mother’s employment status” being “Part-time” is “0.20–3.73”, not “0.20–0.85 *”. Similarly, the 95% CI for the variable of the “Mother’s educational background” being “Junior high school and high school” is “0.22–3.47”, not “0.22–0.84 *”. The corrected Table 3 appears below.
2. Text Correction
In accordance with the above corrections, there were errors in the original publication.
A correction has been made to Section 3, paragraph 4:
In terms of parental education, the odds of participation in swimming among children were lower with mothers reporting a junior high school or high school education (OR: 0.49), and ballet when mothers reported a junior college or vocational school education (OR: 0.07). On the other hand, the odds of participation in gymnastics were higher when fathers had a junior high school or high school education (OR: 5.16).
A correction has been made to Section 4, paragraph 8:
Participation in gymnastics in our sample was higher among children with fathers who were junior high school or high school graduates.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
