Evaluation of the Protective Efficacy of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Vaccines Against O/CATHAY Topotype Virus in Pigs
Ye-Ji Kim, Dong-Wan Kim, Mi-Kyeong Ko, Donghyeon Kim, Seo-Yong Lee, Yerin Kim, Yeonrea Chae, Tae-jun Kim, Hyejin Kim, Min Ja Lee, Sung-Han Park, Jaejo Kim, Jong-Hyeon Park, Ji-Hyeon Hwang, Yoon-Hee Lee

TL;DR
This study tests how well three FMD vaccines protect pigs against a specific virus variant called O/CATHAY, finding that one vaccine, O1/Campos, is most effective.
Contribution
The study evaluates the protective efficacy of three commercial FMD vaccines against the emerging O/CATHAY topotype virus in pigs.
Findings
All three vaccines provided protective effects against the O/CATHAY topotype virus.
O1/Campos induced the fewest clinical signs and significantly reduced virus shedding compared to the control group.
The study suggests O1/Campos could serve as an emergency vaccine but highlights the need for a specific O/CATHAY-targeting vaccine.
Abstract
The world is divided into seven regional pools based on the serotype distribution and geographical spread of the foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus. The Republic of Korea (ROK) belongs to Pool 1, where serotypes O, A, and Asia1 are endemic. Recently, the risk of incursions by the O/CATHAY topotype has increased in Pool 1, raising concerns about its potential introduction into the ROK. To assess the protective effectiveness of three commercial FMD vaccine strains—O1/Manisa + O/3039, O/Primorsky, and O1/Campos—currently used in the ROK against this topotype, an animal challenge experiment was conducted. Three treatment groups (n = 4 in each) of pigs received a single 2 mL injection of one of the vaccines at 8–10 weeks of age, and the other group (n = 2) served as the control. All pigs were challenged with the O/HKN/5/2019 virus (O/CATHAY topotype) at 21 days post-vaccination. All vaccines…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnimal Disease Management and Epidemiology · Viral Infections and Immunology Research · Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
