# Monitoring Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices on Restraint Use in Adult and Pediatric Intensive Care Units: The Multicenter Development and Validation of the CON-Ti-IT Questionnaire

**Authors:** Loredana Dittura, Silvana Schreiber, Valentina Guidi, Manuela Giangreco, Giulia Zamagni, Erica Venier, Raffaella Di Meola, Elisabetta Balestreri, Giorgia Toso, Patrizia Sartorato, Luca Bertocchi, Sara Buchini, Raffaella Dobrina

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/nursrep16010010 · 2025-12-25

## TL;DR

This study created and validated a questionnaire to assess ICU nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding the use of restraints in both adult and pediatric settings.

## Contribution

The first validated tool for assessing ICU nurses' KAP on restraint use in both adult and pediatric settings, particularly for non-English-speaking contexts.

## Key findings

- The CON-Ti-IT questionnaire has 29 items across three subscales with strong content validity (CVI = 0.96).
- The Practices subscale showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.89), while Attitudes and Knowledge had lower consistency.
- Exploratory factor analysis confirmed the tool's structural validity and led to the removal of three items.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: The use of physical restraints in adult and pediatric intensive care units (ICUs) is common yet controversial. While restraints are intended to prevent treatment interference or self-harm, they pose significant physical, psychological, and ethical risks. Nurses in intensive care units play a key role in decisions about restraint application, but there is a global lack of validated tools to assess their knowledge, attitudes, and practices, particularly in non-English-speaking contexts. Aim of this study was to develop and validate a questionnaire for assessing knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of ICU nurses regarding restraint use in adult and pediatric settings. Materials and Methods: A multi-method psychometric validation study was conducted across both adult and pediatric ICU settings at two hospitals in northern Italy. Questionnaire development included literature review, expert consultation, and iterative content and face validity assessments. Reliability was tested using test–retest methods, and construct validity was explored through exploratory factor analysis. The study followed COSMIN guidelines. Results: The final CON-Ti-IT questionnaire comprised 29 items across three subscales: Practices, Attitudes, and Knowledge. It demonstrated strong content validity (CVI = 0.96) and good internal consistency for the Practices subscale (Cronbach’s α = 0.89). Internal consistency for the Attitudes (α = 0.51) and Knowledge (α = 0.47) subscales was lower, reflecting the broader conceptual variability of these domains. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed the structural validity of the tool and led to the removal of three items with low factor loadings. Conclusions: This study presents the first validated tool specifically designed to evaluate ICU nurses’ KAP on restraint in adult and pediatric settings. While developed and validated in Italy, it could undergo cross-cultural adaptation and translation for use in other languages and healthcare systems. Its strong psychometric properties support its application in future research, and the data collected through its use can serve both to improve patient care and to provide a foundation for targeted educational initiatives.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12844329/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12844329