Insights into Nutrient Contents, Fermentation Profiles, Bacterial Communities and Co-Occurrence Network of Small-Bale Oat Silage Prepared with/Without Lentilactobacillus buchneri or Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus
Baiyila Wu, Xue Cao, Shuo Liu, Tong Ren, Yuxin Bao, Hua Mei, Shiba Liu, Chelegeri Zhao, Longli Cong, Shiyang Jiao, Huaxin Niu, Shubo Wen, Haifeng Wang, Yang Song

TL;DR
Adding specific bacteria to oat silage improves its fermentation quality and nutrient content, making it better for ruminant feed.
Contribution
This study demonstrates the effects of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus and Lentilactobacillus buchneri on oat silage fermentation and microbial communities.
Findings
Both bacterial additives increased beneficial compounds and reduced harmful ones in oat silage.
Lentilactobacillus and Lacticaseibacillus were dominant and positively correlated with acetic and lactic acids.
The LB group showed the highest acetic acid and lowest harmful microbes after 30 days.
Abstract
Oat is a forage with high protein value (10–14% DM) and good palatability, and is considered one of the main feed sources for ruminants. In this experiment, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus and Lentilactobacillus buchneri were selected as silage additives to investigate the fermentation quality, nutrient composition, microbial community and relationship between fermentation products and bacterial community of small-bale oat silage after ensiling. The experiment was set up with three treatment groups and three replications in each group, which were the control (C) group, L. rhamnosus (LR) group and L. buchneri (LB) group, and oat silages were subjected to 10-day and 30-day storage periods. The results show that both LR and LB additions significantly increased water-soluble carbohydrate, crude protein, lactic acid, propionic acid and acetic acid contents, and decreased pH, butyric acid, acid…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology · Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows · Probiotics and Fermented Foods
