# Determinants of Telemedicine Satisfaction in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: A Multi-Centre Cross-Sectional Study

## TL;DR

This study explores what influences patient satisfaction with telemedicine for inflammatory bowel disease in Italy, finding that ease of use and prior experience are key factors.

## Contribution

The study identifies specific predictors of telemedicine satisfaction in IBD patients, offering insights for improving remote healthcare models.

## Key findings

- High telemedicine satisfaction was reported among IBD patients in Italy.
- Ease of technology use and prior teleconsultation experience were linked to higher satisfaction.
- Clinical complexity and technical difficulties reduced satisfaction.

## Abstract

Background and Objectives: Telemedicine has become an essential component of chronic Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) care, yet the factors that shape patient satisfaction with remote consultations remain only partially understood. This study aimed to assess satisfaction with institutional telemedicine services among Italian patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), and to identify sociodemographic, clinical and organisational predictors to inform more person-centred telehealth models. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective, multi-centre, cross-sectional study in three IBD units in northern, central and southern Italy between June and October 2024. Consecutive adult patients who had completed a scheduled, non-emergency telemedicine visit were invited within 24–48 h to complete an online questionnaire including the Italian Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire (I-TSQ), sociodemographic items, IBD-related variables, and telemedicine process indicators (accessibility, technology usability, technical support, time saved). Data were analysed descriptively and with multivariable linear regression to determine independent predictors of satisfaction, adjusting for recruiting centre. Results: A total of 705 patients participated (54.9% UC; 55.3% disease duration > 10 years). Overall, telemedicine satisfaction was high (mean I-TSQ total 57.5 ± 4.9; range 35–70), and all respondents reported reduced indirect costs compared with in-person visits. Greater ease of technology use, more frequent contact with the care team, male sex, older age, and employment were independently associated with higher satisfaction scores. Conversely, first-ever teleconsultations, CD, subcutaneous therapies, more difficult platform access, and the need for technical support were linked to lower satisfaction. Model fit was modest (R2 up to 0.20), suggesting the presence of additional unmeasured relational and contextual factors. Conclusions: Telemedicine for IBD is widely accepted in Italy, but satisfaction is strongly conditioned by digital usability, previous experience, and clinical complexity. Tailored telehealth pathways that incorporate user-friendly platforms, proactive technical support, and attention to vulnerable subgroups are needed to translate high satisfaction into sustained, equitable remote care.