Long COVID Does Not Impair Hemodynamic, Vascular, or Autonomic Responses to Maximal Exercise: Sex-Stratified Study in Young Adults

TL;DR

This study finds that young adults with Long COVID have normal cardiovascular and autonomic responses during and after maximal exercise, with no significant impairments compared to controls.

Contribution

The study provides novel sex-stratified data on cardiovascular responses to maximal exercise in young adults with Long COVID, supporting personalized exercise prescriptions.

Findings

Long COVID patients showed preserved hemodynamic and autonomic responses during maximal exercise.

Sex-related differences in blood pressure and heart rate recovery were observed but not affected by Long COVID.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring confirmed normal circadian patterns and systolic dipping in Long COVID patients.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Long COVID (LC) has been linked to fatigue, exercise intolerance, and autonomic dysfunction, but sex-stratified data on cardiovascular responses to maximal exercise—an essential component of personalized medicine—are scarce. This study aimed to examine hemodynamic, autonomic, and functional responses during and up to 24 h after a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) in young adults with and without Long COVID (LC). Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we assessed 38 physically active adults, who were allocated into four subgroups stratified by clinical condition (LC or control) and biological sex: control–female (CON-F; n = 10), LC–female (LC-F; n = 10), control–male (CON-M; n = 10), and LC–male (LC-M; n = 8). Outcomes included systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO), total (TPR) and peripheral vascular resistance (PVR), pulse wave velocity (PWV), augmentation index (AIx@75), and heart rate variability (HF, LF, LF/HF), assessed at rest, peak effort, recovery (1, 3, 5, 10, 30, and 60 min), and through 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) after CPET. Results: SBP increase appropriately during exercise, with higher peaks in males (p < 0.01), and returned to baseline within 5 min across all groups. HR recovery was preserved; however, LC-F showed lower values than CON-F at 3, 5, and 10 min (126 vs. 144 bpm, p = 0.020; 119 vs. 136 bpm, p = 0.020; 94 vs. 109 bpm, p = 0.011), though all groups normalized by 60 min. PWV, AIx@75, TPR and PVR exhibited expected sex-related patterns without LC-related impairments. HRV indices showed transient post-exercise shifts (HF↓, LF↑, LF/HF↑). Ambulatory monitoring confirmed preserved circadian modulation, with normal systolic dipping (11–13%) and no abnormal nocturnal patterns. Conclusions: Young physically active adults with LC showed preserved hemodynamic, autonomic, and vascular responses during and after maximal exercise. These findings contribute to personalized medicine by showing that individualized, sex-stratified cardiovascular assessments reveal no clinically relevant impairments in this population, supporting tailored clinical decision making and exercise prescription.

Figures