# Speed and Distance Redistribution—Lower Limb Power Strategy in Single-Leg-Approach Jumps

## TL;DR

This study shows how changing running speed and distance before a single-leg jump affects power and stiffness in the lower limbs.

## Contribution

The paper provides a joint-level mechanical analysis of how approach speed and distance interact to influence power redistribution during single-leg jumps.

## Key findings

- Approach speed and distance significantly interact to affect jump height, touchdown velocity, and joint power.
- Reactive strength index and ankle stiffness are sensitive to changes in approach speed and distance.
- Power redistribution occurs systematically among hip, knee, and ankle joints based on approach strategy.

## Abstract

This study systematically investigated the influence of approach kinematics on the subsequent kinetics and power production strategies during the approach to running jumps with a single leg (ARJSL). Twenty-five physically active male university students performed ARJSL trials under two prescribed approach speeds (fast and slow) and three approach distances (3, 6, and 9 m) in a 2 × 3 within-subjects design. Three-dimensional motion capture synchronized with force platform data was used to quantify jump height (JH), vertical touchdown velocity (TDv), reactive strength index (RSI), peak joint power (hip, knee, and ankle), and joint stiffness. Significant approach speed × distance interactions were observed for JH (p = 0.006), TDv (p < 0.001), RSI (p = 0.014), ankle stiffness (p = 0.006), and peak power generation at all lower-limb joints (all p < 0.034). The results demonstrate that changes in approach strategy systematically alter the distribution of mechanical power among the hip, knee, and ankle joints, thereby influencing the effectiveness of horizontal-to-vertical momentum conversion during take-off. Notably, RSI and ankle stiffness were particularly sensitive to combined manipulations of speed and distance, highlighting their value as neuromechanical indicators of stretch–shortening cycle intensity and joint loading demands. In conclusion, ARJSL performance depends on finely tuned, speed- and distance-specific biomechanical adaptations within the lower extremity. These findings provide a constrained, joint-level mechanical characterization of how approach speed and distance interact to influence power redistribution and stiffness behavior during ARJSL, without implying optimal or performance-maximizing strategies.