# Comprehensive Assessment of Alfalfa Cultivars for Resistance to Meloidogyne incognita Using Multiple Evaluation Indices

**Authors:** Ying Yu, Xu Zhuang, Sobhi F. Lamlom, Dongmei Zhang, Jianli Wang, Linlin Mu, Lijian Xu, Zhongbao Shen, Weibo Han, Jia You

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/life16010093 · Life · 2026-01-08

## TL;DR

This study evaluates 24 alfalfa varieties for resistance to a harmful nematode, identifying several resistant cultivars and highlighting the need for multiple metrics in resistance assessment.

## Contribution

The study introduces a comprehensive evaluation framework using multiple indices to assess resistance in alfalfa against Meloidogyne incognita.

## Key findings

- 19 alfalfa varieties showed resistance, with Gannong No. 9 being the most resistant.
- DI and EMI metrics revealed inconsistent classifications, emphasizing the need for multiple evaluation methods.
- Root biomass was not a reliable indicator of resistance, while egg mass production correlated with galling severity.

## Abstract

Root-knot nematodes (RKN), especially Meloidogyne incognita, threaten global alfalfa crops because of their broad host range and pathogenic nature. Despite its significance, research on resistance is limited. In this study, 24 varieties from China, the US, Canada, Australia, and France were assessed for resistance using the Disease Index (DI) and Egg Mass Index (EMI). Results identified 19 varieties with varying resistance levels and 5 that were susceptible. Chinese Gannong No. 9 was highly resistant (DI: 10) and achieved the highest composite score (91). The US varieties Dryland and Moste were classified as resistant (DI: 14.3% and 12.5%, respectively) and also ranked highly by composite score (65 and 62.5). A moderate correlation between DI and EMI (r = 0.68) led to some inconsistent classifications, including for 2295, Instict, and WL168HQ, highlighting the importance of using multiple complementary metrics for accurate resistance evaluation. Egg mass production was strongly correlated with galling severity (r = 0.70), while root biomass showed no correlation with galling (r = 0.09), indicating root weight is not a reliable resistance indicator. Preliminary infection dynamics showed similar nematode penetration rates at 2 days post-infection across resistant and susceptible varieties. At 7 days post-infection, both resistant and susceptible varieties retained predominantly J2 larvae (78–89%), with no statistically significant differences in developmental stage distributions. These preliminary observations suggest that resistance-associated effects on nematode development, if present, are not strongly expressed at early stages of infection. The mechanistic basis of resistance in alfalfa remains unresolved and warrants further investigation using additional timepoints, histological analyses of feeding-site development, and molecular characterization. Geographically, American varieties displayed broad performance variation, Chinese varieties showed a bimodal distribution, and Canadian varieties exhibited moderate, consistent resistance. These results offer valuable germplasm for breeding and highlight the importance of multiple resistance metrics. Resistant varieties such as Gannong No. 9 provide important genetic resources for developing durable nematode resistance in alfalfa and can guide variety selection in nematode-infested regions.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Meloidogyne incognita (taxon 6306)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** RKN (MESH:D009349), infection (MESH:D007239), Meloidogyne incognita (MESH:C000656845)
- **Species:** Medicago sativa (alfalfa, species) [taxon 3879], Meloidogyne incognita (southern root-knot nematode, species) [taxon 6306]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12842655/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12842655/full.md

## References

37 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12842655/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12842655