# Precision Neuromodulation Treatment Reverses Motor and Cognitive Slowing After Stroke: Clinical and Neurophysiological Evidence

## TL;DR

A new treatment combining brain stimulation and cognitive training improved motor and cognitive abilities in a stroke patient who had stopped improving with standard rehab.

## Contribution

This case study demonstrates a novel multimodal neurorehabilitation approach using rTMS and cognitive training to reverse chronic post-stroke deficits.

## Key findings

- Motor speed and coordination improved significantly in both hands after treatment.
- Cognitive functions like alertness and visual exploration increased by over 25%.
- qEEG showed increased brain wave power and topographic changes in stimulated regions.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Chronic psychomotor and cognitive slowing after stroke can persist despite standard rehabilitation, especially in young adults with subcortical injuries. Innovative, integrated interventions are crucial for patients who have reached a plateau in their rehabilitation. We present a case of a 41-year-old male with chronic psychomotor and cognitive slowing following a left lenticulostriate infarction (NIHSS score = 5 at onset), who had plateaued after conventional rehabilitation. Methods: Over 4 weeks the patient underwent 20 sessions of a multimodal approach including high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic resonance stimulation over the supplementary motor area and bilateral temporo-parietal junctions and simultaneous computerized cognitive training targeting attention and executive function. Both motor and cognitive assessments, along with quantitative EEG (qEEG) evaluations, were conducted before and after the treatment. Results: At the end of treatment, the patient showed significant clinical improvement: speed and coordination in upper extremities (Finger Tapping Test) increased by 66% (dominant hand) and 74% (non-dominant hand), while finger dexterity (Nine-Hole Peg Test) increased by 25% (dominant hand) and 19% (non-dominant hand). Cognitive scores improved in alertness (58%), visual exploration (25%), and flexibility (24%), while divided attention remained stable. qEEG investigation showed increases in alpha (79%), gamma (33%), and beta (10%) power, with topographic shifts in the stimulated regions. Conclusions: These findings highlight the feasibility of combining targeted rTMS and cognitive training to enhance neuroplasticity in the chronic phase of stroke. Clinical recovery was accompanied by normalized cortical rhythms, suggesting qEEG biomarkers may be useful for tracking treatment response. Multimodal precision neurorehabilitation may offer a path forward for patients with persistent cognitive–motor deficits post-stroke.