# Macrocytosis as an Early Pharmacodynamic Marker of Imatinib Efficacy in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

## TL;DR

Higher red blood cell volume during imatinib treatment for CML is linked to better treatment outcomes and fewer changes in therapy.

## Contribution

Identifies macrocytosis as a potential early indicator of imatinib efficacy in CML patients.

## Key findings

- Patients with increased MCV had higher rates of complete cytogenetic response and major molecular response.
- MCV elevation was associated with a significantly reduced need for treatment modification.
- MCV dynamics could serve as a low-cost pharmacodynamic marker for monitoring CML treatment.

## Abstract

Background: Macrocytosis commonly develops during imatinib therapy, but its relationship with cytogenetic and molecular outcomes in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) remains unclear. We investigated whether increases in mean corpuscular volume (MCV) during imatinib treatment are associated with response depth and treatment persistence. Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed 101 adults with chronic-phase CML treated with a stable imatinib dose of 400 mg/day for at least 12 months. Patients with conditions that could confound MCV (hydroxyurea exposure, megaloblastic anemia, hypothyroidism, chronic liver disease, alcoholism) were excluded. Complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) were assessed by conventional karyotyping and the BCR-ABL1 International Scale, respectively. Increased MCV was defined as MCV > 100 fL after six months of therapy, persisting thereafter. Associations between MCV dynamics, response, and switching to second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors were evaluated. Results: Twenty patients (20%) developed increased MCV. Overall, 86 patients (85%) achieved CCyR and 70 (69%) achieved MMR. All patients with increased MCV attained CCyR, compared with 66 of 81 (81%) without MCV elevation (p = 0.037), while MMR rates were 90% versus 64% (p = 0.030). During a median follow-up of 69 months, treatment modification was required in 1 of 20 (5%) patients with increased MCV versus 25 of 81 (31%) in the non-increased group (p = 0.018). Conclusions: MCV elevation during imatinib therapy is associated with deeper molecular response and reduced need for treatment modification. MCV dynamics may serve as an inexpensive pharmacodynamic marker to support risk assessment and guide monitoring in chronic-phase CML.