# Sentinel Node Biopsy for Head and Neck Melanoma: A 12-Year Experience from a Medium-Volume Regional Center

**Authors:** Péter Lázár, Kristóf Boa, Noémi Mezőlaki, Zoltán Varga, Zsuzsanna Besenyi, Erika Varga, István Balázs Németh, Eszter Baltás, Judit Oláh, Erika Gabriella Kis, József Piffkó, Róbert Paczona

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/jcm15020763 · Journal of Clinical Medicine · 2026-01-17

## TL;DR

This study shows that sentinel lymph node biopsy is a safe and useful procedure for staging head and neck melanoma at a regional hospital.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates the feasibility and prognostic value of sentinel lymph node biopsy for head and neck melanoma in a medium-volume regional center.

## Key findings

- Sentinel lymph node biopsy had a 100% identification rate and no major complications in 38 patients.
- SLN status provided important prognostic information, with SLN-negative patients showing better survival trends.
- Among intermediate-risk melanoma patients, 18.5% had a positive sentinel lymph node.

## Abstract

Background: Head and neck (H&N) cutaneous melanomas have poorer outcomes than melanomas at other sites, yet sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB)—a key prognostic tool in clinically node-negative disease—is less frequently performed, particularly outside tertiary centers. We evaluated the feasibility and prognostic relevance of SLNB in a medium-volume regional institution. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with primary H&N cutaneous melanoma who underwent SLNB at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Szeged, between 2010 and 2022. Clinicopathological features, nodal outcomes, recurrence patterns, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier methods and univariate Cox regression. Results: Thirty-eight patients underwent SLNB, with a 100% sentinel lymph node identification rate and no major complications. Positive sentinel lymph nodes were identified in 8 patients (21.1%). Two false-negative events occurred, resulting in a false-omission rate of 6.7% and a negative predictive value of 93.3%. SLN-negative patients demonstrated longer RFS and OS, although differences were not statistically significant. Among patients with intermediate-risk melanoma (pT1b–pT3a), 18.5% had a positive SLN. Conclusions: SLNB is a safe and clinically meaningful staging procedure for H&N melanoma in a medium-volume regional center. Sentinel node status provides important prognostic information and supports appropriate patient selection for contemporary adjuvant therapy.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** melanoma (MONDO:0005105)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** SLN (sarcolipin) [NCBI Gene 6588]
- **Diseases:** node-negative (MESH:D064726), H&amp;N cutaneous melanoma (MESH:D006258), melanoma (MESH:D008545)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12842317/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12842317/full.md

## References

34 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12842317/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12842317