# A Longitudinal Study of Coping Strategies and Differences by Sex in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain

**Authors:** Xavier Pericot-Mozo, Gloria Reig-Garcia, Afra Masià-Plana, Miquel Sitjar-Suñer, Carme Bertran-Noguer, Josefina Patiño-Maso, Rosa Suñer-Soler

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/jcm15020516 · 2026-01-08

## TL;DR

This study examines how people with chronic back pain cope over time and finds that pain intensity and being female are linked to less effective coping strategies.

## Contribution

The study longitudinally analyzes coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients, revealing sex differences and the impact of pain intensity on coping effectiveness.

## Key findings

- Pain intensity was directly linked to increased passive coping and catastrophizing.
- Active coping strategies decreased over time, while passive strategies increased.
- Female sex was associated with the use of passive coping strategies.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: The most relevant psychological constructs for responding to stress in chronic lumbar pain in a positive way are active coping strategies, positive emotions, and resilience. The aim of this study was to study the coping strategies used by people affected by chronic low back pain and associated factors. Methods: We carried out a prospective longitudinal study involving people on a first visit at the Pain Unit of Josep Trueta University Hospital (Girona, Spain) presenting with chronic back pain, with a follow-up at three months. The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), the Vanderbilt Pain Management Inventory (VPMI), and the Abridged Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) were used. The correlation of variables was analyzed, and a multiple linear regression model was used. Results: A total of 129 people with a mean age of 62.5 years participated (58.1% women). The mean severity of pain was moderate with mild improvement at the follow-up (6.42 to 6.17 points). The use of active coping strategies declined during the study (21.28 to 15.6 points), and a significant increase in passive strategies (23.6 to 30.21 points) and in catastrophizing (13.98 to 14.56 points) was observed. The total resilience scores were slightly better at baseline than at follow-up (27.50 to 26.67 points). The intensity of the back pain had a direct and significant relationship with passive strategies and an inverse relationship with active strategies and resilience. Conclusions: The coping strategies for dealing with chronic back pain observed in the study participants are not fully effective. The intensity of pain is significantly associated with the use of passive strategies and female sex.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** chronic back pain (MESH:D059350), Chronic Low Back Pain (MESH:D017116), Pain (MESH:D010146), back pain (MESH:D001416)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12842098