TESS 2.0—Adaptation of the German Version of the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score: Addition of an Item Regarding the Use of a Touchscreen and Keyboard in the Upper Extremity Questionnaire
Christoph Hofer, Leonie-Sophie Kutscha-Lissberg, Reinhard Windhager, Gerhard M. Hobusch, Carmen Trost

TL;DR
This paper updates the German version of the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score to include modern technology use, ensuring it remains a reliable tool for assessing upper limb function after surgery.
Contribution
The addition of a touchscreen and keyboard use item modernizes the upper extremity assessment in the German TESS.
Findings
TESS 2.0 showed excellent internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha ≥ 0.98.
Strong inverse correlation (r = −0.867) was found between TESS 2.0 and DASH scores.
Test–retest reliability was high with an ICC of 0.98.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Limb salvage surgery is the preferred treatment for bone and soft tissue tumors. The Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). However, its upper extremity section is outdated, lacking assessment of modern technology use. This study adapted TESS (creating TESS 2.0) by adding a question on touchscreen/keyboard use, based on an existing Italian version. Methods: Two independent translations of the new item were synthesized. Linguistic feedback was obtained from two German speakers from Germany and Switzerland. Pretesting with eight individuals refined the wording. Fourteen patients who underwent upper extremity surgery completed the TESS 2.0 twice (once in person, once at home) and the DASH questionnaire once. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and ICC, and validity was assessed using Spearman’s…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment · Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques · Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
