Short-Term Bone Healing in Anterior Maxillary Sockets Using L-PRF With or Without Synthetic HA/β-TCP: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TL;DR

This study compares bone healing in tooth sockets using L-PRF alone or with synthetic grafts, finding that all methods support implant placement.

Contribution

The novel contribution is comparing L-PRF with and without synthetic HA/β-TCP for alveolar ridge preservation in a clinical trial.

Findings

L-PRF combined with HA/β-TCP showed less bone formation than a blood clot alone.

L-PRF alone and autogenous bone grafts had comparable bone formation results.

All treatments supported sufficient bone formation for implant placement within eight weeks.

Abstract

Tooth extraction induces changes in both hard and soft tissues, which may compromise implant placement. Leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) is used to promote tissue healing, either alone or in combination with other grafting materials. Objective: This study aimed to compare post-extraction socket healing using L-PRF alone or combined with a biphasic calcium phosphate graft (HA/β-TCP) after eight weeks. Materials and Methods: 15 patients, both sexes, mean age 56.7 ± 8.2 years, requiring alveolar ridge preservation after single-rooted tooth extraction for subsequent implant placement, were included. Sockets were randomly assigned to four groups: control with blood clot only (CTR), autogenous bone graft (AB), L-PRF membrane (LPRF), and L-PRF combined with HA/β-TCP (LPRFHA). The protocol consisted of tooth extraction and immediate graft placement, followed by bone biopsy at 8 weeks for histomorphometric analysis and implant installation. New Bone Formation (NBF) was quantified from ten photomicrographs per sample using ImageJ software (version 1.54, 5 February 2025). One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc tests was applied, with statistical significance set at p ≤ 0.05. Results: A significant difference in NBF (%) was observed between the control and LPRFHA groups (p = 0.014), with greater bone formation in the control group (62.4 ± 18.6%) compared with LPRFHA (55.8 ± 17.2%; p = 0.012). No significant differences were found among AB, LPRF, and LPRFHA groups. LPRF and AB showed comparable bone formation (60.2 ± 17.5% and 60.1 ± 20.0%, respectively). Conclusions: L-PRF, either alone or combined with HA/β-TCP, can be used for alveolar ridge preservation in maxillary sockets. L-PRF, alone or with synthetic HA/β-TCP graft, effectively preserves the anterior maxillary ridge for early loading at eight weeks. All treatments achieved bone formation for implant placement, with the blood clot alone showing superior results.

Figures