# The Double-High Phenotype: Synergistic Impact of Metabolic and Arterial Load on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Instability

## TL;DR

This study identifies a high-risk blood pressure pattern linked to both metabolic issues and arterial instability, showing that combining these factors improves risk assessment for cardiovascular problems.

## Contribution

The study introduces the 'double-high' phenotype, combining metabolic burden and arterial load to identify a distinct high-risk blood pressure profile.

## Key findings

- The double-high phenotype is strongly associated with non-dipping blood pressure and high systolic variability.
- Arterial load alone provides better model discrimination than metabolic burden for predicting adverse blood pressure patterns.
- Combining TyG and arterial load identifies a small subgroup with extreme blood pressure dysregulation.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Insulin resistance and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) abnormalities represent distinct but interrelated pathways contributing to cardiovascular risk. The triglyceride–glucose (TyG) index reflects metabolic burden, whereas arterial load—captured through arterial stiffness, blood pressure variability, and morning surge—reflects hemodynamic instability. Whether the coexistence of these domains identifies a particularly high-risk ambulatory phenotype remains unclear. To evaluate the independent and combined effects of metabolic burden (TyG) and arterial load on circadian blood pressure pattern and short-term systolic blood pressure variability. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 294 adults who underwent 24 h ABPM. Arterial load was defined using three ABPM-derived indices (high AASI, high SBP-ARV, high morning surge). High metabolic burden was defined as TyG in the upper quartile. The “double-high” phenotype was classified as high TyG plus high arterial load. Primary and secondary outcomes were non-dipping pattern and high SBP variability. Multivariable logistic regression and Firth penalized models were used to assess independent associations. Predictive performance was evaluated using ROC analysis. Results: The double-high phenotype (n = 15) demonstrated significantly higher nighttime SBP, reduced nocturnal dipping, and markedly elevated BP variability. It was the strongest independent predictor of non-dipping (adjusted OR = 42.0; Firth OR = 11.73; both p < 0.001) and high SBP variability (adjusted OR = 41.7; Firth OR = 26.29; both p < 0.001). Arterial load substantially improved model discrimination (AUC = 0.819 for non-dipping; 0.979 for SBP variability), whereas adding TyG to arterial load produced minimal incremental benefit. Conclusions: The coexistence of elevated TyG and increased arterial load defines a distinct hemodynamic endotype characterized by severe circadian blood pressure disruption and exaggerated short-term variability. While arterial load emerged as the principal determinant of adverse ambulatory blood pressure phenotypes, TyG alone demonstrated limited discriminative capacity. These findings suggest that TyG primarily acts as a metabolic modifier, amplifying adverse ambulatory blood pressure phenotypes predominantly in the presence of underlying arterial instability rather than serving as an independent discriminator. Integrating metabolic and hemodynamic domains may therefore improve risk stratification and help identify a small but clinically meaningful subgroup of patients with extreme ambulatory blood pressure dysregulation.